!kjdutkOsheZdjqYmqp:nixos.org

Empty Room

1904 Members
400 Servers

Load older messages

SenderMessageTime
12 Jan 2025
@matthewcroughan:defenestrate.itmatthewcroughantox.chat appears to reference this "TokTok" fork now, so seems legit09:11:30
@aurora0:matrix.orgAurora0 joined the room.16:20:50
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan Lepage K900 should we merge the kernel bump ?
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/370410 		16:41:34
@k900:0upti.meK900No? 6.13 is not out yet16:41:46
@atemu12:matrix.orgAtemuWe had ofborg-like building a little while ago again; where did that go?17:01:44
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilysupposedly it still exists17:06:13
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily see #ofborg:nixos.org 17:06:16
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI've never seen it actually complete a build personally though17:06:24
@atemu12:matrix.orgAtemuI have but I don't even see its CI check queued anywhere17:07:11
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan Lepage
In reply to @k900:0upti.me
No? 6.13 is not out yet
I thought we were only waiting for 6.12.9, which was likely to be released after 6.13. Sorry for the misunderstanding. 		18:05:18
@k900:0upti.meK900No, we are not18:05:35
@k900:0upti.meK900We are waiting for 6.12 to be officially marked as LTS18:05:47
@k900:0upti.meK900Which will likely happen after 6.13.018:05:52
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan Lepage I thought it was the case: https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-6.12-LTS-Kernel-Official
Sorry, let's wait then ;) 		18:18:57
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan Lepage * I thought it was the case: https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-6.12-LTS-Kernel-Official
Sorry, let's wait then :) 		18:19:12
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Ross
In reply to @k900:0upti.me
We are waiting for 6.12 to be officially marked as LTS
it is officially LTS, and has been for ages: https://www.kernel.org/category/releases.html 		18:35:05
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rossthe homepage just doesn't use the "longterm" label for LTSes that also happen to be current stable18:35:41
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan LepageOk, this makes sense18:37:51
@niklaskorz:korz.devNiklas KorzConsidering nixpkgs-review 2.x is pretty much non functional atm unless explicitly specifying local evaluation (due to ofborg results missing), would it be plausible to backport 3.x to release-24.11?18:53:09
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilydoesn't it fall back automatically?18:54:44
@niklaskorz:korz.devNiklas Korznot for me, it always reports no packages are to be built18:57:05
@niklaskorz:korz.devNiklas Korz (for any review I did since the ofborg shutdown, and then I remember to specify --eval local) 18:57:48
@niklaskorz:korz.devNiklas Korzanyhow, for now I'll just pick nixpkgs-review from unstable, but I think it might be worth considering to avoid confusion18:58:11
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan LepageIt should fall back18:58:40
@niklaskorz:korz.devNiklas Korz

without specifying eval:

❯ nixpkgs-review pr 365718
$ git -c fetch.prune=false fetch --no-tags --force https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs master:refs/nixpkgs-review/0 pull/365718/head:refs/nixpkgs-review/1
$ git worktree add /Users/niklaskorz/.cache/nixpkgs-review/pr-365718-1/nixpkgs 549d2f521f398268bc04ee9ce2ed61a048240035
Bereite Arbeitsverzeichnis vor (losgelöster HEAD 549d2f521f39)
Aktualisiere Dateien: 100% (45518/45518), fertig.
HEAD ist jetzt bei 549d2f521f39 hcdiag: init at 0.5.5 (#371689)
$ git merge --no-commit --no-ff be7b92e97dac09dc9c8910b82e723bf1690c6aa3
Automatischer Merge abgeschlossen; halte, wie gewünscht, vor dem Commit an
Nothing to be built.

with eval local:

❯ nixpkgs-review pr --eval local 365718
$ git -c fetch.prune=false fetch --no-tags --force https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs master:refs/nixpkgs-review/0 pull/365718/head:refs/nixpkgs-review/1
$ git worktree add /Users/niklaskorz/.cache/nixpkgs-review/pr-365718-3/nixpkgs 549d2f521f398268bc04ee9ce2ed61a048240035
Bereite Arbeitsverzeichnis vor (losgelöster HEAD 549d2f521f39)
Aktualisiere Dateien: 100% (45518/45518), fertig.
HEAD ist jetzt bei 549d2f521f39 hcdiag: init at 0.5.5 (#371689)
$ nix-env --extra-experimental-features no-url-literals --option system aarch64-darwin -f <nixpkgs> --nix-path nixpkgs=/Users/niklaskorz/.cache/nixpkgs-review/pr-365718-3/nixpkgs nixpkgs-overlays=/var/folders/9g/_bl_31396q31d61z44lgmlvh0000gn/T/tmpsunitweb -qaP --xml --out-path --show-trace --no-allow-import-from-derivation
$ git merge --no-commit --no-ff be7b92e97dac09dc9c8910b82e723bf1690c6aa3
Automatischer Merge abgeschlossen; halte, wie gewünscht, vor dem Commit an
$ nix-env --extra-experimental-features no-url-literals --option system aarch64-darwin -f <nixpkgs> --nix-path nixpkgs=/Users/niklaskorz/.cache/nixpkgs-review/pr-365718-3/nixpkgs nixpkgs-overlays=/var/folders/9g/_bl_31396q31d61z44lgmlvh0000gn/T/tmpsunitweb -qaP --xml --out-path --show-trace --no-allow-import-from-derivation --meta
--------- Impacted packages on 'aarch64-darwin' ---------
2 packages updated:
chatd ollama (0.5.1 → 0.5.4)
18:59:40
@niklaskorz:korz.devNiklas Korz(logs from before 365718 was merged)19:00:03
@niklaskorz:korz.devNiklas Korzand this behavior was pretty much consistent for the past week on nixpkgs-review 2.x19:00:52
@niklaskorz:korz.devNiklas Korz* and this behavior was consistent for the past week on nixpkgs-review 2.x19:01:09
@sigmasquadron:matrix.org@sigmasquadron:matrix.org Am I going insane or is that .devcontainer directory in the nixpkgs root new? 19:05:28
@sigmasquadron:matrix.org@sigmasquadron:matrix.orgThe committee says it was added three years ago but I really doubt that.19:05:52

Show newer messages

Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6