!kjdutkOsheZdjqYmqp:nixos.org

Nixpkgs / NixOS contributions

1880 Members
NixOS 24.05 Uakari | #review-requests:nixos.org | https://nixos.org/blog/announcements.html#nixos-23.11 | https://hydra.nixos.org/jobset/nixos/trunk-combined | https://reproducible.nixos.org/ | 24.05 RMs: wegank & Mic92412 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
24 Oct 2024
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI guess this got an entire merge squashed into a single commit?10:25:18
@atemu12:matrix.orgAtemu

If you make something idiot-proof, someone will just make a better idiot.

10:39:32
@atemu12:matrix.orgAtemu(No offense)10:39:36
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Ross
In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
Alyssa Ross: sorry to ping but feedback on https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/349555#issuecomment-2426754636 would be helpful as I'm worried about Rust bindgen regressing on Darwin for the whole 24.11 release cycle
ack
10:43:10
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rossoh right that thing10:43:30
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rossyes, I trust you to do the right thing here10:44:14
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Ross

Tethys SvenssonI got sick, so I haven't had a chance to look at binutils yet. I will try to after NixCon (or possibly during if I'm not well enough to go…)

10:45:23
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily thanks :) my hope is that we can figure out a way to avoid this entirely on all platforms at some point – e.g. not having a default sysroot of / if we don't actually want system libraries to be picked up with unwrapped compilers on non-NixOS Linux (though I understand there are other things to figure out to make that work okay) 10:45:27
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyhope you feel better soon10:45:41
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Ross(I have a hope that normalizing ack comments on PRs will result in less stuck PRs waiting for somebody to look at them. "I haven't reviewed but don't feel I need to" is such a useful thing to be able to express quickly.)10:48:56
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilywould be nice to have a button for it…10:49:21
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyalthough if it took as many clicks to press as the checkmark currently does it might not be any faster :')10:49:37
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rosshehe10:51:25
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rossyeah this is something the GitHub workflow really lacks10:51:30
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rossand is extremely normal elsewhere10:51:39
@netthier:matrix.orgnetthierHow long does it usually take for a backported PR to land in the nixos-24.05 channel :think11:44:39
@netthier:matrix.orgnetthier* How long does it usually take for a backported PR to land in the nixos-24.05 channel 🤔11:44:45
@netthier:matrix.orgnetthierSpecifically interested in this PR https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/35063911:44:52
@k900:0upti.meK900https://nixpk.gs/pr-tracker.html?pr=35063911:45:10
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rossa day or two usually11:45:26
@netthier:matrix.orgnetthierI've seen that, but I'm not sure how to determine when it will hit said channel based on that11:45:28
@netthier:matrix.orgnetthier
In reply to@qyliss:fairydust.space
a day or two usually
Thanks 👍️
11:46:17
@julius:mtx.liftm.deJCaesar
In reply to @netthier:matrix.org
I've seen that, but I'm not sure how to determine when it will hit said channel based on that
Yeah, it's not really for "when it will", it's for "when it has".
12:11:18
@julius:mtx.liftm.deJCaesar * Yeah, it's not really for "when it will", it's for "if it has". 12:13:54
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily forgive me for this awful question, but – is there a way to detect whether a package argument has been overridden or is direct from callPackage? 12:48:22
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily as in, a version of callPackage ({ packageThatExists ? null }: …) that works? 12:48:34
@aleksana:mozilla.orgaleksana (force me to bed after 18:00 UTC)
In reply to @aleksana:mozilla.org

Is there something new with nss cacert? Now running nixpkgs-review with every PRs fail with

error checking the existence of https://tarballs.nixos.org//sha256-5v54irD0Celu78tbx5zp60KF4Xv5HyUjhz/BY+M+vi4=:
curl: (77) error setting certificate file: /nix/store/h8qhspg7pml84z8s4ghrhmx6m77rs161-nss-cacert-3.104/etc/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt

While running nix-build foo.src --check on latest Nixpkgs checkout with multiple packages is fine

Still can't understand where's the problem... Checking out locally or merging to latest master is still fine
15:11:55
@zi3m5f:matrix.orgzi3m5f joined the room.16:07:05
@9hp71n:matrix.orgghpzin
In reply to@emilazy:matrix.org
as in, a version of callPackage ({ packageThatExists ? null }: …) that works?
If you use pkgs there, you can maybe check if it is equal to what you expected to be there by default.
16:25:13
@9hp71n:matrix.orgghpzin If you can use pkgs there, you can maybe check if it is equal to what you expected to be there by default. 16:25:22

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6