!kjdutkOsheZdjqYmqp:nixos.org

Nixpkgs / NixOS contributions

1864 Members
NixOS 24.05 Uakari | #review-requests:nixos.org | https://nixos.org/blog/announcements.html#nixos-23.11 | https://hydra.nixos.org/jobset/nixos/trunk-combined | https://reproducible.nixos.org/ | 24.05 RMs: wegank & Mic92410 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
21 Oct 2024
@sigmasquadron:matrix.orgSigmaSquadronhuh, in my experience OfBorg takes like an hour max to evaluate, maybe 5-6 to build and check17:00:14
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @sigmasquadron:matrix.org
huh, in my experience OfBorg takes like an hour max to evaluate, maybe 5-6 to build and check
yeah but the queue depth is like 100 PRs waiting and eval takes like 15 minutes with 15 evaluators currently
17:33:24
@lily:lily.flowersLily Fosterso it's gonna be longer than an hour17:33:32
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster(hopefully not too much longer though)17:33:50
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster* yeah but the queue depth is like 100 PRs waiting and eval takes like 15 minutes with 15 evaluators currently working through the queue17:35:34
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster* (hopefully not too much longer than that though)17:35:40
@jh-devv:matrix.orgjh-devv 🏳️‍⚧️image.png
Download image.png
17:44:05
@jh-devv:matrix.orgjh-devv 🏳️‍⚧️

This is in the docker docs for config.Env

17:44:25
@jh-devv:matrix.orgjh-devv 🏳️‍⚧️How do I type this in nix?17:44:55
@jh-devv:matrix.orgjh-devv 🏳️‍⚧️

For pkgs.dockerTools.buildImage.config.Env

17:45:32
@jh-devv:matrix.orgjh-devv 🏳️‍⚧️ *

For pkgs.dockerTools.buildImage.config

17:45:45
@jh-devv:matrix.orgjh-devv 🏳️‍⚧️https://github.com/moby/moby/blob/46f7ab808b9504d735d600e259ca0723f76fb164/image/spec/spec.md#image-json-field-descriptions17:47:10
@jh-devv:matrix.orgjh-devv 🏳️‍⚧️https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/stable/#ex-dockerTools-buildImage-config17:47:31
@jh-devv:matrix.orgjh-devv 🏳️‍⚧️
   > /nix/store/3jnyh9rpp00b3y4mkl4xrpvppqj7yca7-stdenv-linux/setup: eval: line 1815: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `"'
17:52:31
@jh-devv:matrix.orgjh-devv 🏳️‍⚧️oh17:58:02
@jh-devv:matrix.orgjh-devv 🏳️‍⚧️found the issue17:58:05
@jh-devv:matrix.orgjh-devv 🏳️‍⚧️lol17:58:06
@luckytethys:matrix.orgTethys Svensson Alyssa Ross: Are you planning on doing more cleanup to binutils or are you done for now? :) 18:04:07
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa RossI'm opening a PR as we speak :)18:07:27
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa RossI had to wait for the periodic merge action, because this one has to go to staging.18:07:38
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Rossbut it just finished18:07:56
@diniamo:matrix.orgdiniamo joined the room.18:09:28
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa RossI don't think there's much more to do after this. If we were doing full binutils packages for other platforms, I'd pull enableGold's default value out into all-packages.nix so it didn't affect those packages, but I'd still prefer to only have gas packages if possible, so I'm holding off on that for now.18:10:36
@luckytethys:matrix.orgTethys Svensson Alyssa Ross: I think I can do a nixpkgs specific patch for pwntools to make it use binutils-unwrapped-all-targets for everything except gas. I don't think an upstream patch is going to more work than I'm able to commit to at this time. 18:11:51
@luckytethys:matrix.orgTethys SvenssonI wouldn't know how to make a gas-only build either.18:12:43
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa RossMy guess is that we just need to set sourceRoot to gas18:12:58
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa RossBut I can check18:13:01
@luckytethys:matrix.orgTethys Svensson * Alyssa Ross: I think I can do a nixpkgs specific patch for pwntools to make it use binutils-unwrapped-all-targets for everything except gas. I think an upstream patch is going to more work than I'm able to commit to at this time. 18:13:04
@qyliss:fairydust.spaceAlyssa Ross
In reply to @luckytethys:matrix.org
Alyssa Ross: I think I can do a nixpkgs specific patch for pwntools to make it use binutils-unwrapped-all-targets for everything except gas. I think an upstream patch is going to more work than I'm able to commit to at this time.
I'd be happy with this, but the pwntools package maintainers will need to be too.
18:14:36
@luckytethys:matrix.orgTethys SvenssonI'm pretty sure at least 1 out of 3 of the pwntools maintainers (kristoff3r) would be happy to accept that. I don't know the other maintainers.18:15:56

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6