!kyXJonZuBXCGzVwuSn:nixos.org

Systems Programming

175 Members
Kernel, stdenv, low-level hacking, patchelf, … 62 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
27 Jul 2024
@k900:0upti.meK900And then I guess some hyperscaler bonks them and they push the EPYC updates to linux-firmware07:32:55
@k900:0upti.meK900And then people start asking and they push desktop Ryzen too07:33:04
@woobilicious:matrix.orgwoobiliciousThat's until the mobo manufacturer stops bios updates lol07:33:09
@k900:0upti.meK900...are you on, like, AM3?07:33:29
@k900:0upti.meK900Because AM4/AM5 boards and all the EPYCs are still supported on every major vendor I know of07:33:43
@woobilicious:matrix.orgwoobiliciousNo, AM4, but I think my old Ivy bridge was effected by Spectre back in the day and there was no bios update for that.07:34:24
@k900:0upti.meK900I mean07:34:41
@k900:0upti.meK900Did Intel even issue microcode updates for that07:34:52
@woobilicious:matrix.orgwoobiliciousLooks like there's a bios update I can apply for RET bug, such a PITA to do though, resetting all my bios settings sucks.07:36:41
@woobilicious:matrix.orgwoobilicious K900: my laptop is a 5000 series Ryzen and hasn't had a bios update ship since Oct 2022, there's like 4 security patches on my AM4 desktop bios that can't be included. 07:46:47
@k900:0upti.meK900Ah shiet07:49:49
@k900:0upti.meK900Our kernel is built without CONFIG_MICROCODE_LATE_LOADING07:49:54
@k900:0upti.meK900So you do need to use those options07:50:08
@k900:0upti.meK900And we should probably enable it07:50:13
@woobilicious:matrix.orgwoobiliciousAhh that explains why I didn't see anything in dmseg07:50:18
@woobilicious:matrix.orgwoobiliciousIntel i9 owners will be happy they got another 6 months out of it before it dies lol07:51:22
* @k900:0upti.meK900 goes to enable ucode updates07:54:47
@aloisw:kde.org@aloisw:kde.org
In reply to @k900:0upti.me
And then people start asking and they push desktop Ryzen too
Did they ever push anything other than Epyc?
13:53:07
@k900:0upti.meK900Yes13:53:14
28 Jul 2024
@woobilicious:matrix.orgwoobiliciousAll the more reason to push AMD etc to support coreboot.00:09:42
@woobilicious:matrix.orgwoobilicious K900: how quickly does your X3D chip compile the stock kernel? 05:26:35
@k900:0upti.meK900 Like 10-12 minutes 05:30:17
@woobilicious:matrix.orgwoobiliciousWhat model is that? My 5900x does it in about 20mins05:31:18
@k900:0upti.meK9007950X3D06:59:02
@k900:0upti.meK900But base model 7950X is about as fast06:59:10
@k900:0upti.meK900Thanks to the reduced clock speed on the X3D chiplet06:59:22
@woobilicious:matrix.orgwoobiliciousAhh, the extra L3 doesn't help that much?06:59:46
@woobilicious:matrix.orgwoobiliciousMy system looks like it might be slightly IO bound too, perhaps your SSD + lack of bcachefs might be helping lol.07:00:58
@k900:0upti.meK900It generally seems to ~tie the base model in heavily threaded productivity workloads07:01:56
@woobilicious:matrix.orgwoobiliciousYeah, I saw some speculation that the large L3 might help for compliation work due to gcc binary being huge, but never looked in to it much due to the fact that AM4 didn't have X3D for the dual CCD models at the time.07:06:01

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6