| 21 Dec 2021 |
|  Linux Hackerman joined the room. | 13:15:36 |
| Linux Hackerman | In reply to @mic92:nixos.dev
Take that! https://github.com/Mic92/tracedump/blob/main/tracedump/perf/cpuid.py WHY | 13:17:55 |
|  Dandellion joined the room. | 13:20:49 |
|  K900 joined the room. | 13:23:49 |
|  tnias joined the room. | 13:25:33 |
|  tomberek joined the room. | 13:28:18 |
|  moritz.hedtke joined the room. | 13:31:56 |
 Mic92 | In reply to @linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.de
WHY To avoid dependencies. Pip is not so great in general | 13:35:38 |
| Mic92 | What the logo would be? | 13:38:26 |
| Mic92 | * What would the logo would be? | 13:38:44 |
| Mic92 | * What could the logo be? | 13:39:00 |
|  wentasah joined the room. | 14:05:52 |
| Mic92 | https://nixos.wiki/wiki/C#Use_a_clang_compiled_from_source I found a workaround this morning for using compilers build incrementally from git: https://nixos.wiki/wiki/C#Use_a_clang_compiled_from_source | 16:34:57 |
| Mic92 | * https://nixos.wiki/wiki/C#Use_a_clang_compiled_from_source I found a workaround this morning for using compilers build incrementally from source | 16:35:20 |
|  fzakaria joined the room. | 16:42:57 |
| fzakaria | hi | 16:43:12 |
|  fpletz joined the room. | 16:47:14 |
|  gdamjan joined the room. | 17:51:57 |
|  Qubasa joined the room. | 17:55:45 |
| Qubasa | In reply to @mic92:nixos.dev
https://nixos.wiki/wiki/C#Use_a_clang_compiled_from_source I found a workaround this morning for using compilers build incrementally from source Ohh cool! | 18:03:11 |
| fzakaria | for those familiar with musl vs glibc trying to diagnose: https://github.com/seL4/musllibc/issues/16 | 18:17:51 |
|  chvp joined the room. | 19:03:28 |
| Mic92 | fzakaria: anything specific you want to know about musl? I would suggest to compile it from source and add a few printf statements in the code to track this down. | 19:20:29 |
| Mic92 | the ld code is maybe a bit more complex than other parts of musl but not super hard. I read it quite a bit when building nix-ld. | 19:21:28 |
 andi- | speaking of lbc's has anyone looked at llvm's new libc? | 19:24:02 |
| andi- | Been thinking of switching to clang + clang-libc for my packagset as I am getting annoyed by GNU-things | 19:24:26 |
| Mic92 | I actually went to the university where L4 came from. All os devs are conditioned to microkernels there. | 19:24:31 |
| Mic92 | In reply to @andi:kack.it
speaking of lbc's has anyone looked at llvm's new libc? To me it seems like this project was more indented as research project to find out what to fix in clang to make it easier to build libc's. Are there any real-world users of this yet? | 19:26:14 |
| andi- | I odn't know. I've only seen it about a month ago when the project page still stated "will be a project that does ....". So apparently very early in development. | 19:26:55 |
| andi- | https://llvm.org/docs/Proposals/LLVMLibC.html is that page | 19:27:26 |
