!lTqhfnNvIkcEackxxk:matrix.org

Nix Bindings

70 Members
Nix C API https://github.com/NixOS/nix/blob/master/doc/manual/src/c-api.md, language-specific bindings, and their use cases (currently broken link: https://nixos.org/manual/nix/unstable/c-api)19 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
30 Dec 2024
@o-santi:matrix.orgLeonardo Santiago
In reply to @roberthensing:matrix.org
So if you were to reimplement parts of develop with the C API, you'd end up duplicating those problems, and you won't support user-defined shell runners
yes, I very much noticed that, and I'd love if the environment variable handling logic was done entirely in nix
14:42:47
@o-santi:matrix.orgLeonardo Santiago the problem I'm trying to tackle is turning a derivation into a runnable shell. it seems to me that all that needs to be done is concatenating the buildInputs paths and running the shellHook as the --rcfile 14:51:13
@o-santi:matrix.orgLeonardo Santiago but looking at the develop c++ code, there are a bunch of stuff going on, including creating another derivation to export env vars as json, running it, parsing from json, and so on 14:52:50
@o-santi:matrix.orgLeonardo Santiagois there any simple way to replicate that behavior without having to mimic the c++ code? i don't really understand what constraints are at play here so for me it seems just overcomplicating for (seemingly) no reason, but I'm sure there's some motive behind all this14:54:27
31 Dec 2024
@zantonarthwyng:matrix.orgzantonarthwyng joined the room.01:10:59
1 Jan 2025
@zantonarthwyng:matrix.orgzantonarthwyng removed their display name zantonarthwyng.06:39:36
@zantonarthwyng:matrix.orgzantonarthwyng left the room.06:43:45
@butterbohn:matrix.orgbutterbohn joined the room.11:35:50
@butterbohn:matrix.orgbutterbohn left the room.13:05:59
@mjolnir:nixos.orgNixOS Moderation Botchanged room power levels.14:26:12
2 Jan 2025
@error_pro:matrix.orgerror_pro joined the room.10:12:04
4 Jan 2025
@kranzes:matrix.orgIlan Joselevich (Kranzes) left the room.15:30:46
7 Jan 2025
@annatrans:matrix.org@annatrans:matrix.org joined the room.02:16:02
8 Jan 2025
@mjolnir:nixos.orgNixOS Moderation Bot banned @annatrans:matrix.org@annatrans:matrix.org (spam).11:57:18
10 Jan 2025
@o-santi:matrix.orgLeonardo Santiago what's the difference between nix_store_realise and nix_string_realise when the value is a derivation path? and is there a way to build multiple paths when the derivation itself can't be built? or do i need to just call nix_store_realise in a loop - this does not seem very efficient 14:12:30
@o-santi:matrix.orgLeonardo Santiago * what's the difference between nix_store_realise and nix_string_realise when the value is a derivation path? and is there a way to build multiple (input source) paths when the derivation itself can't be built? or do i need to just call nix_store_realise in a loop - this does not seem very efficient 14:12:43
@o-santi:matrix.orgLeonardo Santiago * what's the difference between nix_store_realise and nix_string_realise when the value is a derivation path? and is there a way to build multiple (input source) paths when the derivation itself can't be built? calling nix_store_realise in a loop does not seem very efficient 14:13:05
@alex:afuchs.deAlexander Fuchs left the room.15:02:44
@o-santi:matrix.orgLeonardo Santiago basically, is there any intent to add Store::buildPaths to the C API 16:16:43
11 Jan 2025
@pandapip1:matrix.orgpandapip1 joined the room.21:23:02
14 Jan 2025
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92 I used nixstorerealize instead of buildPaths in the past 13:39:33
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92 I used nix_store_realize instead of buildPaths in the past 13:39:49
15 Jan 2025
@roberthensing:matrix.orgRobert Hensing (roberth)contributions welcome06:19:41
@roberthensing:matrix.orgRobert Hensing (roberth) we do have nix_string_realise, in case your paths come from the same string in the expression language 06:20:43
@roberthensing:matrix.orgRobert Hensing (roberth)

what's the difference

The string one also works for strings that have multiple store paths in them, whereas nix_store_realise doesn't require the nix-expr library

06:22:58
@o-santi:matrix.orgLeonardo Santiagohonestly I have been thinking about contributing given the amount of time I have been reading nix source code the last couple of days, but I have literally 0 experience in C++ 15:23:43
@o-santi:matrix.orgLeonardo Santiagoand most of the code still confuses me, specially regarding inheritance and file importing that creates "spooky action from distance"15:25:04
@o-santi:matrix.orgLeonardo Santiago but yeah, right now I need to implement a way to build a derivation through the C FFI, and honestly I think the easiest way will be to re-export as string, eval it, and use nix_string_realise onto it 15:32:40
16 Jan 2025
@water-sucks:matrix.orgwatersucks changed their profile picture.02:55:40
@water-sucks:matrix.orgwatersucks changed their profile picture.03:07:10

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10