| 24 Apr 2024 |
|  @admin:nixos.org changed the history visibility to "world_readable" from "shared". | 16:47:24 |
| @admin:nixos.org invited  NixOS Moderation Bot. | 16:47:53 |
| @admin:nixos.orgchanged room power levels. | 16:48:06 |
| NixOS Moderation Bot joined the room. | 16:49:14 |
|  hexa joined the room. | 16:49:23 |
| @admin:nixos.org | infinisil: please step down to moderator | 16:52:11 |
| @admin:nixos.orgchanged room power levels. | 16:52:16 |
| @admin:nixos.org left the room. | 16:52:28 |
|  infinisilchanged room power levels. | 16:53:07 |
| infinisil | Done :) | 16:53:24 |
|  fricklerhandwerk joined the room. | 17:21:15 |
|  John Ericson joined the room. | 18:34:02 |
|  Marcus joined the room. | 21:47:47 |
| Marcus | o/ | 21:47:58 |
| Marcus | I got the go bindings updated to a point where they compile against the current api, currently struggling with the callback for nix_get_string and trying to get the value back to go. | 22:07:57 |
| Marcus | 
Download image.png | 22:45:27 |
| Marcus | welp, this looks better already, not crashing hard 🙂 | 22:45:42 |
| Marcus | Not sure why the leading . on the path it stripped when passing to nix_init_path_string 🤔 | 22:55:45 |
| Marcus | * Not sure why the leading . on the path is stripped when passing to nix_init_path_string 🤔 | 22:55:54 |
| 25 Apr 2024 |
|  @adis:blad.is joined the room. | 00:21:38 |
| infinisil changed the room topic to "Nix C bindings, language-specific bindings, and their use cases" from "C and language-specific bindings for Nix". | 00:27:47 |
| Marcus | In reply to @joerg:thalheim.io
And nix-serve (also that one uses perl bindings?) Should the perl bindings also be changed to use the C bindings? 🤔 | 06:26:46 |
| fricklerhandwerk | In reply to @marcusramberg:matrix.org
Should the perl bindings also be changed to use the C bindings? 🤔 It would fit the agenda of getting the C API a baseline adoption in order to iron out the kinks. But there's a fundamental resource constraint at the moment: who's gonna do the work and who's gonna merge the PRs? There's a quick way out of this: saying whoever does the job gets commit access and ownership of that code, all strings attached. I don't think this has consensus though, but I'd like to be surprised. | 07:01:39 |
| Marcus | In reply to @fricklerhandwerk:matrix.org
It would fit the agenda of getting the C API a baseline adoption in order to iron out the kinks. But there's a fundamental resource constraint at the moment: who's gonna do the work and who's gonna merge the PRs? There's a quick way out of this: saying whoever does the job gets commit access and ownership of that code, all strings attached. I don't think this has consensus though, but I'd like to be surprised. I've pinged stigtsp about this as well, since he's more in touch with his Perl roots than I am these days 🙂 I quickly looked at the existing bindings, seems they use XSLoader towards the c++ code. | 07:10:10 |
 jlesquembre | Could an admin add a link to https://github.com/NixOS/nix/labels/c%20api in the channel description? Notice that it's a list with all open issues/PRs with the "c api" label instead of a link to the milestone (https://github.com/NixOS/nix/milestone/52) because we have some PRs that aren't in the milestone | 08:14:33 |
 Mic92 | In reply to @marcusramberg:matrix.org
Should the perl bindings also be changed to use the C bindings? 🤔 Potentially. I think the perl api was already an ok abstraction on top of Nix. So maybe it could be used as a starting point? | 09:30:02 |
| Mic92 | In reply to @marcusramberg:matrix.org
Should the perl bindings also be changed to use the C bindings? 🤔 * Potentially. I think the perl api was already an ok abstraction on top of Nix c++ api. So maybe it could be used as a starting point? | 09:30:14 |
| Mic92 | The API I was using in harmonia was inspired by the perl api. | 09:30:39 |
