nixpkgs-update | 180 Members | |
| Keeping nixpkgs up to date. r-ryantm bot. https://github.com/ryantm/nixpkgs-update and https://github.com/nix-community/infra/blob/master/build02/nixpkgs-update.nix | 57 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Mar 2025 | ||
| 15:33:07 | ||
| the answer to this, I think: the fflogs derivation no longer works for the latest fflogs version, and nixpkgs-update is unhelpfully printing a message about unfreeness rather than The Actual Error Message. fixing the derivation then running nixpkgs-update locally works juuuust fine. | 17:14:19 | |
| 11 Mar 2025 | ||
| 19:59:25 | ||
| 12 Mar 2025 | ||
| 21:10:06 | ||
| 17 Mar 2025 | ||
| 06:47:52 | ||
| Am I interpreting the logs correctly, that aerc's updateScript has been executed by r-ryantm 5 times in 2025 with those ~14 days between each execution? Or are there additional attempts not being logged? | 16:31:12 | |
| all attempts get logged | 20:21:21 | |
| Thanks! I was wondering about the frequency of attempts. | 20:55:54 | |
| me too 🙂 | 22:48:42 | |
| 18 Mar 2025 | ||
| Redacted or Malformed Event | 12:07:57 | |
| 20 Mar 2025 | ||
| 03:17:41 | ||
| 03:19:04 | ||
| 03:20:17 | ||
| 21 Mar 2025 | ||
| 15:41:58 | ||
| 23 Mar 2025 | ||
It is a bit annoying that the bot automatically substitutes ${version} with ${src.tag} in meta.changelog.Is this made on purpose? If not, where should I send a PR to disable this? | 10:20:09 | |
In reply to @glepage:matrix.orgIt is more accurate in some cases, and wrong in others. Would be good to disable, in my opinion. PR probably to the nixpkgs-update repo? | 20:45:00 | |
| Yes, as there is no clear consensus on which one is best, I don't think that the update script should enforce one of them. | 21:11:56 | |
| I'll have a look | 21:12:26 | |
| Gaétan Lepage: Are you sure that this is necessary? (especially for a new contributor)
| 21:15:25 | |
In reply to @sigmasquadron:matrix.orgI didn't know that! I thought that specifying updateScript was necessary for the bot to work. (except for python packages where this is set by default). | 21:16:58 | |
| As far as I understand, that's what the documentation means by "It uses package repository information from Repology.org, the GitHub releases API, and the package passthru.updateScript to generate a lists of outdated packages." (emphasis mine) I'm not exactly sure if that's for some internal "list of outdated packages" or the actual update itself, so take this with a grain of salt. | 21:20:14 | |
| I'm just more concerned about making such reviews for first-time contributors; we can merge a package as-is, and add non-essential improvements later on. | 21:21:28 | |
* I'm just more concerned about making such reviews for first-time contributors; we can merge a package as-is, and add non-essential improvements later on. (ditto for using lib.cmakeBool, since that library is really only used in situations where the boolean isn't always true or false. The string flag is fine.) | 21:23:14 | |
| 24 Mar 2025 | ||
In reply to @sigmasquadron:matrix.orgIt’s not necessary for the bot, but can be helpful for maintainers running the update scripts in repo | 12:23:10 | |
| 25 Mar 2025 | ||
| 17:00:10 | ||
| 31 Mar 2025 | ||
| 11:30:38 | ||
| Hi,
In my understanding, the issue should was already addressed with: | 11:37:56 | |
| 1 Apr 2025 | ||
In reply to @xenos76:matrix.org that PR targets the I've now tagged it for backport to 24.11, so a backport PR has been automatically created: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/395044 | 00:18:53 | |