| 27 Jan 2025 |
 srhb | Ah, yes. I'll have a look at that. | 08:54:43 |
| srhb | Yep, thanks, think I fixed it, https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/377256 | 09:13:52 |
| 28 Jan 2025 |
 Perchun Pak [don't ping; dm instead] | could we reopen https://github.com/Mic92/nixpkgs-review/issues/430 please?
see https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/377508#issuecomment-2618905015 | 20:34:31 |
| 2 Feb 2025 |
|  pbsds changed their display name from pbsds to pbsds (FOSDEM). | 16:04:48 |
| 3 Feb 2025 |
| pbsds changed their display name from pbsds (FOSDEM) to pbsds. | 16:25:35 |
| 5 Feb 2025 |
|  detroyejr joined the room. | 01:49:47 |
| 6 Feb 2025 |
 Morgan (@numinit) | What's the usual practice for nested attributes where I'd like to expose an update script? For instance, we want to expose a single attribute in androidenv, which is an attrset, not a derivation itself. | 03:29:53 |
| Morgan (@numinit) | Provided, this is also a custom update script not using nix-update or something else. | 03:30:42 |
| Morgan (@numinit) | Do I need to expose the passthru on the top level attribute? Is the solution a well placed recurseIntoAttrs? Never done this before, so unsure. :-) | 03:34:15 |
| Perchun Pak [don't ping; dm instead] | is this what are you looking for? | 07:43:46 |
| Perchun Pak [don't ping; dm instead] | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/34c5ee1a54bbf1ccfd2f5443564ccb6e71c05879/pkgs/applications/editors/vim/plugins/non-generated/blink-cmp/default.nix#L1 | 07:43:47 |
| Perchun Pak [don't ping; dm instead] | * https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/34c5ee1a54bbf1ccfd2f5443564ccb6e71c05879/pkgs/applications/editors/vim/plugins/non-generated/blink-cmp/default.nix | 07:43:52 |
| Morgan (@numinit) | Close-ish. More wondering how a passthru.updateScript that's not nixpkgs-update (i.e. it's a custom script) would work on an attribute that isn't toplevel. | 21:07:05 |
| 8 Feb 2025 |
|  Marcel joined the room. | 20:26:59 |
| 10 Feb 2025 |
|  carlossless joined the room. | 18:50:35 |
| carlossless | Would anyone know why eval could be failing on an update PR here: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/380939#issuecomment-2648941718? | 18:51:12 |
| 11 Feb 2025 |
|  ramblurr joined the room. | 11:52:59 |
| 14 Feb 2025 |
|  bmgsh joined the room. | 06:37:48 |
| 15 Feb 2025 |
|  BenjB83 joined the room. | 10:17:36 |
| BenjB83 changed their display name from Benjamín Buske to BenjB83. | 10:43:04 |
| 18 Feb 2025 |
| bmgsh | i recently manually updated package optinix i can see from https://r.ryantm.com/log/ that it has never been attempted to automatically update. is there some process to register a package for autoupdates? | 06:03:19 |
 K900 | The auto-updates pull from repology, and that being a nix specific tool, it's probably not tracked on there | 06:04:35 |
| bmgsh | ok. thanks. i asked this in another channel, does passthru.updateScript = nix-update-script { }; register the package for updates using nix-update? or does a package always have to be in repology to get auto updated? | 06:21:56 |
| K900 | I don't think it does | 06:22:41 |
| Perchun Pak [don't ping; dm instead] | In reply to @bmgsh:matrix.org
ok. thanks. i asked this in another channel, does passthru.updateScript = nix-update-script { }; register the package for updates using nix-update? or does a package always have to be in repology to get auto updated? passthru.updateScript is enough | 15:08:54 |
|  kittydoor joined the room. | 20:12:16 |
| kittydoor | It appears that "tenv" is not receiving a new update on nixpkgs even though a release was made on Feb 9.
Release: https://github.com/tofuutils/tenv/releases/tag/v4.2.0
Latest nixpkgs PR: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/370428
Search for similar: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues?q=tenv
Current version in nixpkgs unstable: v4.1.0 (as per the above PR)
Is anyone here able to help me understand more about why this could be the case? | 20:14:02 |
| kittydoor | * It appears that "tenv" is not receiving a new update on nixpkgs even though a release was made on Feb 9.
Release: https://github.com/tofuutils/tenv/releases/tag/v4.2.0
Latest nixpkgs PR: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/370428
Search for similar: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues?q=tenv
Current version in nixpkgs unstable: v4.1.0 (as per the above PR)
Latest release: v4.2.4
Is anyone here able to help me understand more about why this could be the case? | 20:14:49 |
| 22 Feb 2025 |
|  voxel 🏳️⚧️ joined the room. | 23:28:50 |
| 25 Feb 2025 |
 sorrel | o/ I just got notified that nixpkgs-update is failing to build fflogs: https://nixpkgs-update-logs.nix-community.org/fflogs/2025-02-25.log
the log complains about an unfree licence, but this has not been an issue in the past, and nothing has changed in the fflogs derivation since the last nixpkgs-update PR. does anyone know what's changed? | 14:47:31 |
