| 17 Nov 2025 |
|  FMEE joined the room. | 13:50:16 |
| FMEE left the room. | 18:08:44 |
| 18 Nov 2025 |
|  jopejoe1 (4094@39c3) changed their display name from jopejoe1 to jopejoe1 (4094@39c3). | 20:18:35 |
|  dave :3 joined the room. | 22:59:03 |
| 20 Nov 2025 |
|  John joined the room. | 06:35:20 |
|  winston joined the room. | 18:26:01 |
| 21 Nov 2025 |
 zowoq | Should be fixed by https://github.com/nix-community/nixpkgs-update/pull/502. | 23:53:28 |
|  clonejo left the room. | 23:54:14 |
| 22 Nov 2025 |
 bmgsh | Thank you @zowoq:matrix.org | 02:01:30 |
| 23 Nov 2025 |
| dave :3 set a profile picture. | 16:53:39 |
| 24 Nov 2025 |
|  whispers (it/fae) joined the room. | 00:27:23 |
| whispers (it/fae) left the room. | 02:25:52 |
| 25 Nov 2025 |
|  steeringwheelrules left the room. | 18:12:22 |
| 27 Nov 2025 |
|  nobahari joined the room. | 16:26:02 |
|  Cooper F joined the room. | 22:09:53 |
| 2 Dec 2025 |
|  Fuckill joined the room. | 11:52:27 |
| Fuckill removed their display name Fuckill. | 12:46:14 |
| Fuckill left the room. | 12:46:20 |
| 3 Dec 2025 |
|  shelvacu joined the room. | 21:30:20 |
| shelvacu | I'm the maintainer of copyparty, a python package with a few variants like copypart-min. r-ryantm created PRs for all the variants but didn't make a PR for copyparty:
How do I convince r-ryantm to update copyparty but not copyparty-*? Will adding the # nixpkgs-update: no auto update work even when the meta and version attrs are in a different file? | 22:25:11 |
| shelvacu | I think I have it figured out, I can override meta.description so that nix edit/meta.position points to the right file, and then that file can have the comment. This feels kinda awkward, I wish I could just set meta.nixpkgs-update = false, or even better some attr to indicate that a package is ""downstream"" of some other package, and thus doesn't need updating | 23:59:54 |
| 4 Dec 2025 |
| zowoq | Adding the prefix copyparty- to the skiplist is an easier option.
https://github.com/nix-community/nixpkgs-update/blob/main/src/Skiplist.hs
| 00:44:32 |
| shelvacu | I saw that, but that seems like a worse hack. Ideally nixpkgs-update doesn't need to know about every single package, yeah? | 00:45:32 |
| Cooper F left the room. | 03:00:33 |
|  poschi joined the room. | 15:29:13 |
| poschi | Hi, I noticed that the nixpkgs-update downgraded parsedmarc from 8.18.6 to 6.18.7. It looks like a bug: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/440926 / https://nixpkgs-update-logs.nix-community.org/parsedmarc/2025-08-26.log In addition 6.18.7 dose not exist in parsedmarc repo but it seems like there was some strange commits between 8.18.6 and 8.18.7 tag. | 15:40:35 |
 hexa | that's the fault of nix-update | 16:02:47 |
| hexa | * that's the fault of nix-update, which gets used as the default update script for python packages | 16:02:56 |
 sebastian | Redacted or Malformed Event | 23:27:56 |
|  Vladislav Grechannik joined the room. | 23:54:45 |
