| 25 Oct 2024 |
|  Renato Trevisan joined the room. | 07:17:39 |
| 26 Oct 2024 |
|  plmh joined the room. | 05:23:17 |
| 30 Oct 2024 |
|  tobifroe joined the room. | 20:58:48 |
| 7 Nov 2024 |
 Luke | Hey, I have an updateScript in libfive, but the hot has not picked up that there were updates to the package since the commit currently in nixpkgs. I discovered this by running the updater script locally, and it seems to be working. What’s going on here? | 02:36:37 |
| Luke | * Hey, I have an updateScript in libfive, but the bot has not picked up that there were updates to the package since the commit currently in nixpkgs. I discovered this by running the updater script locally, and it seems to be working. What’s going on here? | 02:36:51 |
| Luke | In reply to @luke:vuksta.com
Hey, I have an updateScript in libfive, but the hot has not picked up that there were updates to the package since the commit currently in nixpkgs. I discovered this by running the updater script locally, and it seems to be working. What’s going on here? Looking at the logs, it seems like after the alias was changed from ao to libfive it detected an update properly here: https://nixpkgs-update-logs.nix-community.org/libfive/2024-10-16.log | 20:56:37 |
| Luke | Is this an issue related to the change of the alias? | 20:57:39 |
| 8 Nov 2024 |
 zowoq | I've deployed a fix for this, it was an issue with the service that generates the list of packages with an updateScript for the update bot, the service allowed aliases but the bot doesn't. | 07:53:16 |
| Luke | In reply to @zowoq:matrix.org
I've deployed a fix for this, it was an issue with the service that generates the list of packages with an updateScript for the update bot, the service allowed aliases but the bot doesn't. Thanks! | 15:02:13 |
| 12 Nov 2024 |
| Luke removed their profile picture. | 17:33:24 |
| Luke set a profile picture. | 17:34:08 |
| Luke removed their profile picture. | 17:34:56 |
| Luke set a profile picture. | 17:35:30 |
 SigmaSquadron | Did something happen to r-ryantm? It's been over a month since it last attempted an iPXE update, and there are no visible errors. | 22:31:22 |
| zowoq | r-ryantm is fine but it is throttled because of the load on ofborg. | 23:19:37 |
| zowoq | https://ofborg.org/prometheus/graph?g0.expr=ofborg_queue_evaluator_waiting&g0.tab=0&g0.display_mode=lines&g0.show_exemplars=0&g0.range_input=2w | 23:19:45 |
| 13 Nov 2024 |
|  inayet joined the room. | 22:18:40 |
| 15 Nov 2024 |
|  hausken joined the room. | 05:19:46 |
| 19 Nov 2024 |
|  oliver.falvai joined the room. | 08:13:31 |
| 20 Nov 2024 |
| inayet removed their profile picture. | 00:59:06 |
 asymmetric | In reply to @zowoq:matrix.org
r-ryantm is fine but it is throttled because of the load on ofborg. what's the relationship between r-ryantm and ofborg? like, why does high load on ofborg result in r-ryantm being throttled? | 22:06:20 |
| asymmetric | are they running on the same infra? | 22:06:57 |
| 21 Nov 2024 |
| zowoq | No, they don't run on the same infra. It gets throttled to keep the PR eval queue wait time reasonable, unfortunately ofborg seems to be kinda broken at the moment and the eval queue just keeps getting worse. Ofborg is being replaced with github actions so hopefully won't need to throttle it. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/355847 | 02:18:11 |
|  karlericsson joined the room. | 10:27:01 |
| 22 Nov 2024 |
|  Morgan (@numinit) joined the room. | 17:49:25 |
| 25 Nov 2024 |
| asymmetric | looking at this, it seems like the package that's printed in the logs is [generic.nix](
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs
/tree/master/pkgs/data/sgml+xml/schemas/xml-dtd/docbook/generic.nix) rather than [4.5.nix](
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs
/tree/master/pkgs/data/sgml+xml/schemas/xml-dtd/docbook/4.5.nix), which imports it. is that a bug? | 12:19:45 |
| asymmetric | * looking at this, it seems like the package that's printed in the logs is generic.nix rather than [4.5.nix](
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/tree/master/pkgs/data/sgml+xml/schemas/xml-dtd/docbook/4.5.nix), which imports it. is that a bug? | 12:20:08 |
| asymmetric | * looking at this, it seems like the package that's printed in the logs is generic.nix rather than 4.5.nix, which imports it. is that a bug? | 12:20:19 |
| asymmetric | * looking at this, it seems like the package that's printed in the logs is generic.nix rather than 4.5.nix, which imports it.
then nixpkgs-update can't find 4.5 in the package, and doesn't file an update PR to 5.1.
is that a bug?
| 12:20:58 |
| 26 Nov 2024 |
| zowoq | It looks in generic.nix because of meta.position:
❯ EDITOR=echo nix edit -f. docbook_xml_dtd_45
/home/zowoq/src/nixpkgs/pkgs/data/sgml+xml/schemas/xml-dtd/docbook/generic.nix
doesn't file an update PR to 5.1.
Sorry, I don't understand this. If the bot did file that PR, wouldn't it be incorrect?
| 04:16:53 |
