| 2 Jul 2025 |
 kuflierl | In reply to @gh22:princeton.systems
Really? It works on my side Actually, i just realised why...
The closing bracket is counted AS part oft THW link | 02:04:24 |
| kuflierl | * Actually, i just realised why...
The closing bracket is counted AS part oft the link | 02:04:30 |
| kuflierl | * Actually, i just realised why...
The closing bracket is counted as part oft the link | 02:04:42 |
 zowoq | Currently the bot doesn't really support updating package sets. I'm planning to fix it but don't have a timeframe. | 02:31:56 |
 Gongqi Huang | Gotcha, I was thinking of maybe creating a (potentially dummy) typstFull package which calls my update script and uses hash of the metadata file as its version. Maybe this is gonna work | 03:58:38 |
| Gongqi Huang | Just did https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/421686, not sure if there's a better way of doing it | 05:29:25 |
 sorrel | question: is r-ryantm meant to be able to update existing PRs if a new upstream version is released? (i.e. if r-ryantm opens "A -> B", then upstream releases C, should r-ryantm change that PR to "A -> C"?) | 11:16:28 |
| sorrel | I ask because I thought I'd observed it doing that previously, but it failed to do so in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/412461#issuecomment-3013733328 | 11:16:50 |
| kuflierl | As far as I remember, a PR is only ignored if the string "x.x -> y.y" matches. That means it should create the new pr | 11:18:07 |
| 6 Jul 2025 |
|  JamieMagee joined the room. | 02:29:58 |
|  CJ changed their display name from CJ to Cathal. | 17:17:29 |
| 19 Sep 2023 |
|  evils joined the room. | 16:15:20 |
 ryantm | raitobezarius: No, not really. It's been an idea for a long time to have grouped package updates like that, but it hasn't been implemented. | 16:52:21 |
| evils | hi, second link in the channel topic is dead | 19:21:58 |
| evils | is there a way to see what packages the bot tried to update but failed on? | 19:22:23 |
 Artturin | In reply to @evils:nixos.dev
is there a way to see what packages the bot tried to update but failed on? https://r.ryantm.com/log/ | 19:23:49 |
| Artturin | https://ryantm.github.io/nixpkgs-update/nixpkgs-maintainer-faq/#nixpkgs-maintainer-faq | 19:23:56 |
| Artturin | * from https://ryantm.github.io/nixpkgs-update/nixpkgs-maintainer-faq/#nixpkgs-maintainer-faq | 19:23:58 |
| evils | 
Download image.png | 19:24:43 |
| evils | oof that's a subtle link underline | 19:24:50 |
| evils | (i was looking at the page :) | 19:25:02 |
| Artturin | yeah | 19:26:15 |
| evils | ok, why do all KiCad update attempts end in "Do not update GNOME during a release cycle"? | 19:30:21 |
| ryantm |
| 19:44:27 |
| ryantm | * [ryantm@replit1:~/p/nixpkgs]$ EDITOR=echo nix edit -f . kicad
/home/ryantm/p/nixpkgs/pkgs/applications/science/electronics/kicad/default.nix
[ryantm@replit1:~/p/nixpkgs]$ cat /home/ryantm/p/nixpkgs/pkgs/applications/science/electronics/kicad/default.nix | grep gnome
, gnome
"--prefix XDG_DATA_DIRS : ${gnome.adwaita-icon-theme}/share" | 19:44:32 |
| Artturin | the check here is wrong https://github.com/ryantm/nixpkgs-update/blob/8fedf8f6f29280578e335bf4483c9f88d4bcdbaa/src/Skiplist.hs#L151 | 19:45:39 |
| Artturin | just a naive grep | 19:45:49 |
| Artturin | maybe a better way would be to check for teams.gnome.members | 19:47:29 |
| Artturin | still has false positives but way less | 19:47:37 |
| ryantm | https://github.com/ryantm/nixpkgs-update/commit/2fda8bcb73776c3e11c0155fa15e138a71e1f189 | 19:49:37 |
