!lZLfSUtSOVjwYTmPbU:nixos.org

nixpkgs-update

171 Members
Keeping nixpkgs up to date. r-ryantm bot. https://github.com/ryantm/nixpkgs-update and https://github.com/nix-community/infra/blob/master/build02/nixpkgs-update.nix55 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
28 Oct 2025
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang WaltherThe merge bot looks at different data, and merging would always be possible without the label. The label is just informational for others.13:02:28
@ivy:faggot.shivyi know like obviously i can't merge this because i'm not a committer and the bot didn't make it13:04:22
@ivy:faggot.shivyalso for some reason it seems r-ryantm attempts to evaluate the package after updating it, and if its not able to be evaluated on linux it says failed to update leaving it unusable for darwin only programs13:07:24
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang WaltherWell, I interpreted your earlier comment to mean that you thought you wouldn't even be able to merge an automated PR yourself, because the label was missing, too. These two are different, so just because the label was missing now, that would not mean that the merge bot for an automated PR would not work. That's all I'm saying.13:08:44
@ivy:faggot.shivynah i didnt assume that13:09:14
@ivy:faggot.shivymy thought was that it makes the pr seem less like an easy job for a committer13:09:27
@ivy:faggot.shivyif it doesn't say im the maintainer it incites greater unneeded scrutiny13:09:47
@ivy:faggot.shivybut it doesn't help that nixpkgs-update seems to attempt to evaluate all packages it updates, even if they will not evaluate on that platform13:10:45
@ivy:faggot.shivysee this https://nixpkgs-update-logs.nix-community.org/karabiner-dk/2025-10-13.log13:11:07
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang Walther I think that's your own update script doing that. You're using common-updater-scripts "update-source-version". Try it's --system= argument to force aarch64-darwin for evaluation. 13:16:25
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang Walther * I think that's your own update script doing that. You're using common-updater-scripts "update-source-version". Try its --system= argument to force aarch64-darwin for evaluation. 13:16:34
@ivy:faggot.shivyahhhh13:19:26
@ivy:faggot.shivyvery unclear in documentation of nixpkgs-update that that's how its meant to work13:19:45
@ivy:faggot.shivyhttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/456375/files#diff-75161e8aee386e7decface68b5a78abb13d2a58e0203dc03819e5863fc6d8d48R45-R47 this should work right?13:26:16
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.orgWolfgang WaltherI'd hope so. But ultimately, I'm just guessing as well.13:28:34
@h4rl:h4rl.devh4rl joined the room.18:19:46
@h4rl:h4rl.devh4rl hii18:20:29
@h4rl:h4rl.devh4rl i had to actually "fix" my matrix server for this18:25:08
29 Oct 2025
@kuflierl:matrix.orgkuflierl

On a completely different note, i noticed that in my latest PR nix-update seems to update the Go Derivation hash but seems to use the generated hash for the Protobuf Derivation. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/456029

How to reproduce:

  • check out PR and go back a commit before the update but after the fix.
  • run: nix-update -u memos
  • observe the diff to my last commit
12:41:05
@kuflierl:matrix.orgkuflierl *

i noticed that in my latest PR nix-update seems to update the Go Derivation hash but seems to use the generated hash for the Protobuf Derivation. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/456029

How to reproduce:

  • check out PR and go back a commit before the update but after the fix.
  • run: nix-update -u memos
  • observe the diff to my last commit
12:41:21
1 Nov 2025
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan Lepage changed their profile picture.22:52:53
@glepage:matrix.orgGaétan Lepage changed their profile picture.22:53:55
7 Nov 2025
@xx0a_q:matrix.orgadam (moved to @adam:matrix.system72.dev) changed their display name from adam perkowski to adam (moved to @adam:matrix.system72.dev).17:51:33
@emma:rory.gay@emma:rory.gay left the room.22:44:36
9 Nov 2025
@ieda:matrix.org@ieda:matrix.orgRedacted or Malformed Event18:51:11
@ieda:matrix.org@ieda:matrix.orgSorry, wrong room was open. But I might as well use this opportunity to ask a question I didn't find a clear answer yet. If a package is darwin-only, currently there is no way for the bot to create PRs for it? I maintain many packages for darwin and I'd like a way to automate the updates, if possible.18:57:49
@clonejo:ccc.ac@clonejo:ccc.ac joined the room.20:33:46
@samasaur:matrix.orgsamasaurit should work for darwin-only packages20:35:03
10 Nov 2025
@ieda:matrix.org@ieda:matrix.org left the room.13:33:34
@kachick:matrix.orgkachick joined the room.14:13:43

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9