| 28 Oct 2025 |
 ivy | nah i didnt assume that | 13:09:14 |
| ivy | my thought was that it makes the pr seem less like an easy job for a committer | 13:09:27 |
| ivy | if it doesn't say im the maintainer it incites greater unneeded scrutiny | 13:09:47 |
| ivy | but it doesn't help that nixpkgs-update seems to attempt to evaluate all packages it updates, even if they will not evaluate on that platform | 13:10:45 |
| ivy | see this https://nixpkgs-update-logs.nix-community.org/karabiner-dk/2025-10-13.log | 13:11:07 |
 Wolfgang Walther | I think that's your own update script doing that. You're using common-updater-scripts "update-source-version". Try it's --system= argument to force aarch64-darwin for evaluation. | 13:16:25 |
| Wolfgang Walther | * I think that's your own update script doing that. You're using common-updater-scripts "update-source-version". Try its --system= argument to force aarch64-darwin for evaluation. | 13:16:34 |
| ivy | ahhhh | 13:19:26 |
| ivy | very unclear in documentation of nixpkgs-update that that's how its meant to work | 13:19:45 |
| ivy | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/456375/files#diff-75161e8aee386e7decface68b5a78abb13d2a58e0203dc03819e5863fc6d8d48R45-R47 this should work right? | 13:26:16 |
| Wolfgang Walther | I'd hope so. But ultimately, I'm just guessing as well. | 13:28:34 |
|  h4rl joined the room. | 18:19:46 |
| h4rl | hii | 18:20:29 |
| h4rl | i had to actually "fix" my matrix server for this | 18:25:08 |
| 29 Oct 2025 |
 kuflierl | On a completely different note, i noticed that in my latest PR nix-update seems to update the Go Derivation hash but seems to use the generated hash for the Protobuf Derivation.
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/456029
How to reproduce:
- check out PR and go back a commit before the update but after the fix.
- run: nix-update -u memos
- observe the diff to my last commit
| 12:41:05 |
| kuflierl | * i noticed that in my latest PR nix-update seems to update the Go Derivation hash but seems to use the generated hash for the Protobuf Derivation.
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/456029
How to reproduce:
- check out PR and go back a commit before the update but after the fix.
- run: nix-update -u memos
- observe the diff to my last commit
| 12:41:21 |
| 1 Nov 2025 |
|  Gaétan Lepage changed their profile picture. | 22:52:53 |
| Gaétan Lepage changed their profile picture. | 22:53:55 |
| 7 Nov 2025 |
|  adam (moved to @adam:matrix.system72.dev) changed their display name from adam perkowski to adam (moved to @adam:matrix.system72.dev). | 17:51:33 |
|  @emma:rory.gay left the room. | 22:44:36 |
| 9 Nov 2025 |
 @ieda:matrix.org | Redacted or Malformed Event | 18:51:11 |
| @ieda:matrix.org | Sorry, wrong room was open. But I might as well use this opportunity to ask a question I didn't find a clear answer yet. If a package is darwin-only, currently there is no way for the bot to create PRs for it? I maintain many packages for darwin and I'd like a way to automate the updates, if possible. | 18:57:49 |
|  @clonejo:ccc.ac joined the room. | 20:33:46 |
 samasaur | it should work for darwin-only packages | 20:35:03 |
| 10 Nov 2025 |
| @ieda:matrix.org left the room. | 13:33:34 |
|  kachick joined the room. | 14:13:43 |
| 11 Nov 2025 |
 bmgsh | does anyone have an idea why this might happen?https://nixpkgs-update-logs.nix-community.org/libdaq/2025-11-10.log. when i run nix-update locally I get the same changes and it builds, creating both result-lib and result-dev as output. The manual PR is here https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/460560 | 03:59:19 |
| 12 Nov 2025 |
|  inayet changed their display name from inayet to Inayet. | 12:39:33 |
| 17 Nov 2025 |
|  @fmee:matrix.org joined the room. | 13:50:16 |
| @fmee:matrix.org left the room. | 18:08:44 |
