!lZLfSUtSOVjwYTmPbU:nixos.org

nixpkgs-update

149 Members
Keeping nixpkgs up to date. r-ryantm bot. https://github.com/ryantm/nixpkgs-update and https://github.com/nix-community/infra/blob/master/build02/nixpkgs-update.nix43 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
22 Apr 2025
@sistema.matrix:matrix.orgThomas joined the room.17:31:10
1 May 2025
@rosariopulella:matrix.orgRosuavio changed their display name from Rosario Pulella to Rosuavio.20:09:22
@mnaser:matrix.orgmnaser joined the room.21:41:43
@mnaser:matrix.orgmnaserI'm struggling to understand why the following package did not get bumped: https://nixpkgs-update-logs.nix-community.org/python312Packages.python-aodhclient/2025-04-30.log In my case here, there is no updateScript as it claims to say there is one: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/development/python-modules/python-aodhclient/default.nix Also, there is totally a newer tag (for quite sometime): https://github.com/openstack/python-aodhclient/tags Does the buildPythonApplication come with its own updater?21:44:11
@mnaser:matrix.orgmnaserSorry, future lore for those who want to figure it out: nix-update python3Packages.python-aodhclient It shows that somehow the next version from 3.6.0 is yoga-eol (openstack tags repos with a eol tag) and I assume it things that's the latest :)21:48:01
2 May 2025
@sandro:supersandro.deSandro 🐧buildPythonPackage has a default update script01:55:18
@sandro:supersandro.deSandro 🐧yeah, that is probably also a mirror02:13:23
8 May 2025
@samasaur:matrix.orgsamasaur joined the room.03:24:24
13 May 2025
@perchun:matrix.orgPerchun Pak [don't ping; dm instead]How do I point out that derivation itself is a source? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/development/libraries/astal/source.nix https://nixpkgs-update-logs.nix-community.org/astal.source/2025-05-13.log12:22:51
@fliegendewurst:matrix.orgFliegendeWurst (@GPN23) passthru.src = final; maybe 13:53:40
@fliegendewurst:matrix.orgFliegendeWurst (@GPN23)though the setup seems a bit odd to me anyway13:53:53
@fliegendewurst:matrix.orgFliegendeWurst (@GPN23)why not just have the updateScript in one of the normal packages?13:54:34
14 May 2025
@perchun:matrix.orgPerchun Pak [don't ping; dm instead]
In reply to @fliegendewurst:matrix.org
why not just have the updateScript in one of the normal packages?
So update bot would have a better name for PR
11:38:55
18 May 2025
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all) Okay, i give up-
Following package:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/by-name/sd/SDL_ttf/package.nix
We currently set the version "2.0.11.1-unstable-2024-04-23.
Upstream only has a tag for 2.0.11. They won't be tagging any more old versions for SDL_ttf for SDL1. But, canonically, we are on 2.0.11.1: https://github.com/libsdl-org/SDL_ttf/commit/e31d11a692e5b55e8e624ad766e4e44d655422c8
Currently, running the update script on SDL_ttf just crashes, because the 2.0.11.1 tag does not exist. But removing the .1 isn't entirely correct either. What is the best way to make the update script succeed and still correctly represent the version?
21:17:46
@fliegendewurst:matrix.orgFliegendeWurst (@GPN23)Removing the ".1" seems correct to me, we use the last released version in the unstable naming scheme.21:21:51
@fliegendewurst:matrix.orgFliegendeWurst (@GPN23)And 2.0.11 is the last released version21:21:58
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)

pbsds said 2.0.11.1 was the actual version, but dropping the .1 would have been my solution too. It is common for release notes entries to be prepared before the tag (and edited later!). And https://repology.org/docs/requirements also explicitly says to do -post of tagged too:

Obviously, no fake versions, e.g. versions which were not officially released by upstream. Note that a mere mention of "next" version by upstream (in changelog or build system script) does not make it official. A git tag or a release announcement does.

21:23:36
@pederbs:pvv.ntnu.nopbsdsjust checked with repology, no one else cares about the .121:24:03
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)

As in:

  • we can do whatever
  • we should keep it
  • we should drop it
  • not required
  • ???
21:25:29
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all) if we can drop the .1 then thats almost certainly the simplest and what i'd want to do 21:25:54
@pederbs:pvv.ntnu.nopbsdsi am agreeable to drop it21:26:06
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)do they have a matrix/irc?21:26:58
@pederbs:pvv.ntnu.nopbsdshttps://repology.org/project/sdl-ttf/versions21:27:33
@pederbs:pvv.ntnu.nopbsdsoh wait there are two distros21:28:05
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)oh, that - yeah they mostly just set that ignored on nixpkgs becasue -unstable, not because .1. And they do not like the .1, or else it'd be green21:28:59
@pederbs:pvv.ntnu.nopbsdsguix also has the .121:29:50
20 May 2025
@kongrooparadox:matrix.orgkongrooparadox joined the room.21:45:47
21 May 2025
@spaenny:tchncs.dePhilipp joined the room.18:20:24
22 May 2025
@surnamerefill:matrix.org@surnamerefill:matrix.org joined the room.00:02:12
@steeringwheelrules:tchncs.desteeringwheelrules joined the room.04:44:26

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9