!lheuhImcToQZYTQTuI:nixos.org

Nix on macOS

1181 Members
“There are still many issues with the Darwin platform but most of it is quite usable.” — http://yves.gnu-darwin.org194 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
31 May 2021
@domenkozar:matrix.orgDomen Kožarposted a small status update at https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/105026#issuecomment-85136051509:36:07
@kloenk:petabyte.devFinn BehrensI don't understood yet how to build the release tarballs with hydra. Not sure if we have to add anything else into the flake for that09:37:00
@domenkozar:matrix.orgDomen Kožarthat's automatic09:40:17
@domenkozar:matrix.orgDomen Kožarwe'll also need to change the installer to use the correct platform09:40:44
@kloenk:petabyte.devFinn Behrens
In reply to @domenkozar:matrix.org
we'll also need to change the installer to use the correct platform
this change? https://github.com/NixOS/nix/commit/5e86de3cd8c60e59ed57ca9f4b3a9aab3fca5425
09:52:56
@domenkozar:matrix.orgDomen KožarI think it sets x86_64-darwin is used as a platform by default currently09:54:07
@kloenk:petabyte.devFinn Behrensyes, thats whats removed on the other side, as far as i can tell09:54:33
@domenkozar:matrix.orgDomen Kožarah! all good09:54:54
@timtraversy:matrix.orgtimtraversy joined the room.12:26:28
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterni (he/him)why does nix have a reimplementation of the lowdown package in nixpkgs anyways?17:08:19
1 Jun 2021
@0x4a6f:matrix.org[0x4A6F] changed their display name from 0x4A6F to [0x4A6F].06:35:09
@domenkozar:matrix.orgDomen Kožar Finn Behrens: channels are out 06:59:17
@joerg:bethselamin.deMic92
In reply to @sternenseemann:systemli.org
why does nix have a reimplementation of the lowdown package in nixpkgs anyways?
Historical reasons?
07:23:33
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterni (he/him) Mic92: yeah I think they added a dynamic library which we didn't have in nixpkgs for a time, but it was upstreamed at some point 07:24:36
@kloenk:petabyte.devFinn Behrens
In reply to @domenkozar:matrix.org
Finn Behrens: channels are out
PR is created: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/4865
07:54:36
@domenkozar:matrix.orgDomen KožarNice :)07:55:32
@kloenk:petabyte.devFinn Behrensdo we need to add support for aarch64-darwin to nix stable? or is this not needed, as it always will be used through nixpkgs, and not like nix master through a flake08:09:02
@kloenk:petabyte.devFinn BehrensI think it would look like this, but I'm not sure. shall i open a pr for that?08:12:38
@kloenk:petabyte.devFinn Behrenshttps://github.com/Kloenk/nixos-nix/commit/75f787dce2aaa702c895e4f22a26fe713b109f8108:12:39
@domenkozar:matrix.orgDomen Kožarthat's also needed for tarball support08:13:54
@kloenk:petabyte.devFinn BehrensSo I create a pr? or did I miss some lines. Not sure what you mean by that08:14:54
@domenkozar:matrix.orgDomen KožarI'd add that to the existing PR08:16:01
@kloenk:petabyte.devFinn Behrensit's a different branch. The later is based on 2.3-maintenance 08:16:29
@domenkozar:matrix.orgDomen Kožarah, you're talking about 2.3 :)08:17:15
@kloenk:petabyte.devFinn Behrensrelease.nix is not present in the repo anymore. stable nix is done via flake-compat08:17:18
@domenkozar:matrix.orgDomen Kožardoes it build on aarch64-darwin with that patch?08:17:50
@kloenk:petabyte.devFinn Behrensas far as I can tell, yes. It also can build packages08:19:45
@kloenk:petabyte.devFinn Behrens So i tested nix repl in the resulting binary and build hello as aarch64-darwin 08:20:07
@domenkozar:matrix.orgDomen KožarNice :)08:20:25
@domenkozar:matrix.orgDomen KožarI think that's better than nothing so I'd open a PR08:20:35

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6