!lheuhImcToQZYTQTuI:nixos.org

Nix on macOS

1179 Members
“There are still many issues with the Darwin platform but most of it is quite usable.” — http://yves.gnu-darwin.org192 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
1 Jun 2021
@r_i_s:matrix.orgris_cool20:26:27
@daiderd:matrix.orgLnLif you wanted a precedent for the curl situation, that said using normal options instead having to patch stuff for these cases would be nice20:27:57
@r_i_s:matrix.orgris_yeah i think for the medium term that sounds like a sensible plan20:28:56
@r_i_s:matrix.orgris_ if curl go on to use frameworks more thoroughly, then that might be time to rethink 20:29:25
@daiderd:matrix.orgLnLif I go back I see I made it conditional for bootstrapping initially now it's always just patched out20:29:33
@daiderd:matrix.orgLnLyeah, if my idea for bootstrapping works then it doesn't matter anymore20:30:59
@daiderd:matrix.orgLnLand as an added benefit we kill a bunch of dependencies in the bootstrap tree (except for bootstrap-tools itself)20:31:24
@daiderd:matrix.orgLnL toonn: I see a bunch more stuff in there, those Libsystem changes etc. are needed for the bump? 20:32:57
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn LnL: Yeah, everything but the xnu patch. But that's a bugfix unless my python understanding's lacking. 20:35:05
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn Well, "bug." It doesn't seem to have caused any trouble so far. 20:35:25
@r_i_s:matrix.orgris_one day if i ever understand the various bootstrap loops i'm going to draw a big tube map style diagram to document them20:35:44
@daiderd:matrix.orgLnLalright, just checking I was expecting more package fixes and less stdenv stuff20:36:17
@daiderd:matrix.orgLnLbut it's not all that fancy, guess the target things are handled by newer compilers now20:36:55
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn Here's my notes on the TargetConditionals.h stuff, https://git.io/JGz3q 20:40:11
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn I haven't fixed any packages yet because I haven't built any. 20:40:25
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn I'm not sure how to go about that actually. I thought a hydra jobset was the first step? 20:41:00
@daiderd:matrix.orgLnLyeah, unless you already encountered obvious stuff20:41:25
@daiderd:matrix.orgLnLeval is pending...20:41:47
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn Most of the commits deal with new flags introduced between LLVM 9 and 11, turning them back to the old behavior. 20:43:01
@daiderd:matrix.orgLnLheh :D20:43:22
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn I sent an email about this to the cpio mailing list but haven't gotten any response so we're probably stuck with at least some of these. 20:44:56
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn About the not building with default flags. 20:45:16
@daiderd:matrix.orgLnLhmm the eval is still not there21:25:53
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn LnL: Does it have anything to do with this ofborg-eval failure, "This PR does not cleanly list package outputs after merging. 21:50:19
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn "? 21:50:23
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn Getting late, I'll look into it further tomorrow. 21:59:46
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn Feel free to comment on the PR with things I need to do to get it evaluated. 22:00:26
2 Jun 2021
@telent:matrix.orgtelentRedacted or Malformed Event08:09:11
@telent:matrix.orgtelentRedacted or Malformed Event08:09:36
@telent:matrix.orgtelentRedacted or Malformed Event09:19:14

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6