| 5 Nov 2025 |
 alexfmpe | $ echo "stdenv.buildPlatform.config" | nix repl --file . --argstr system "x86_64-darwin"
"x86_64-apple-darwin"
I don't have remote builders so I guess the fact I can build stuff this way means I'm using rosetta? I do see test suites running
| 20:54:12 |
| alexfmpe | * $ echo "stdenv.buildPlatform.config" | nix repl --file . --argstr system "x86_64-darwin"
"x86_64-apple-darwin"
I don't have remote builders so I guess the fact I can build stuff this way on my aarch64-darwin means I'm using rosetta? I do see test suites running
| 20:54:25 |
 K900 | Yes | 20:55:40 |
 Randy Eckenrode | There is Darwin to Darwin cross support, but it comes with caveats. | 20:59:12 |
|  colemickens 🏳️🌈 joined the room. | 22:57:26 |
| colemickens 🏳️🌈 | Is it possible to use HM to configure Ghostty on macOS even though it's not installable via nix/hm? | 22:58:03 |
 samasaur | Yes | 22:59:57 |
| samasaur | set programs.ghostty.package to null | 23:01:16 |
 Isolaryn | In reply to @colemickens:matrix.org
Is it possible to use HM to configure Ghostty on macOS even though it's not installable via nix/hm? What do you mean not installable? | 23:07:43 |
| colemickens 🏳️🌈 | I don't think it's available for aarch64-darwin | 23:08:12 |
| samasaur | ghostty doesn't build on Darwin because it needs the real (unfree) xcodebuild and/or Swift 6 | 23:08:38 |
| samasaur | I don't remember what the current blocker is off the top of my head | 23:09:05 |
| samasaur | *doesnt build via Nix | 23:09:12 |
| Isolaryn | There is a ghostty-bin package for this occasion in nixpkgs | 23:09:15 |
| Isolaryn | Unless from source is something you require | 23:09:38 |
| samasaur | yeah. personally though when the option is a binary from nixpkgs or a binary direct from the project I just download direct from the project | 23:10:27 |
| 6 Nov 2025 |
 Ihar Hrachyshka | we have the llvm patch that broke firefox aarch64 bisected: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129889
bad news is it's - probably? - not scoped to darwin and it's - probably? - affecting other apps. And it's - definitely - hard to say which are affected without running them.
wonder if it justifies a global CFLAGS edit to disable the optimization.
emily fyi
| 00:02:03 |
| Ihar Hrachyshka | * we have the llvm patch that broke firefox aarch64 bisected: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129889
bad news is it's - probably? - not scoped to darwin and it's - probably? - affecting other apps. And it's - definitely - hard to say which are affected without running them.
wonder if it justifies a global C(PP)FLAGS edit to disable the optimization.
emily fyi
| 00:04:31 |
 EsperLily [she/her] | emily: is there anything left to do on https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/455760? you approved it some time ago (and then I updated the PR since then) but I can't merge it myself | 01:06:09 |
|  @remilapeyre:matrix.org left the room. | 10:03:27 |
|  Clemens Schlipfinger joined the room. | 17:04:44 |
| 7 Nov 2025 |
|  jopejoe1 (4094@39c3) joined the room. | 10:17:24 |
| jopejoe1 (4094@39c3) | Looks like firefox 145 wants apple-sdk_26 which is not available on 25.05 could some one with more Darwin knowledge than me take a look at that?
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/459417
| 10:33:30 |
| jopejoe1 (4094@39c3) | cc @ihar.hrachyshka:matrix.org as you did most of the firefox darwin stuff | 10:40:11 |
|  titus🐼 joined the room. | 11:48:55 |
| titus🐼 left the room. | 11:54:53 |
 purrtner | If someone has a spare minute and any clue about macOS Keychain in nix build environment, I‘d love to hear from you at https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/459492 .
I‘m not really sure, how to proceed. If someone could put me in a direction, I can perhaps fix the issue myself. | 16:22:29 |
| Randy Eckenrode | Probably just disable the test. | 16:27:56 |
| purrtner | I kind of guessed something like that 🙃. I‘ll flesh something out on the weekend then, I guess. Thanks for your educated opinion | 16:39:39 |
| Randy Eckenrode | Unfortunately, disabling impure tests is usually the best we can do. | 17:06:28 |
