| 2 Dec 2025 |
xored | imma tell you all, do not forget your backup destination or else you would be me right now kekw | 00:06:11 |
xored | oh boy | 00:06:56 |
xored | https://forum.openmediavault.org/index.php?thread/56569-samba-4-22-debian-13-will-break-timemachine/ | 00:06:57 |
Randy Eckenrode | I think just standard user:group/755 for the Samba users in question. | 00:09:33 |
Randy Eckenrode | Why would a feature that is needed for Time Machine be removed because of data loss for Windows clients? | 00:11:34 |
samasaur | okay I am home | 00:13:12 |
Randy Eckenrode | So now there will definitely be problems for Mac users. | 00:13:16 |
samasaur | can confirm that my time machine is still working | 00:13:17 |
samasaur | smbd v4.22.5 | 00:13:37 |
samasaur | and based on the nixpkgs history it looks like the earliest version I could have started with was samba 4.22.3 | 00:16:08 |
xored | continued backups will continue to work | 00:17:12 |
xored | I reckon | 00:17:15 |
xored | the only thing failing is the initial one | 00:17:21 |
samasaur | right but i was on what would have been an affected version when i did the initial one | 00:17:31 |
Randy Eckenrode | https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15926 | 00:17:33 |
xored | it was fixed on 4.21.6 | 00:17:39 |
xored | https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.22.6.html | 00:17:40 |
xored | 4.22.6 I mean | 00:17:45 |
xored | im compiling now | 00:17:50 |
xored | lol | 00:17:52 |
xored | hopefully that fixes it | 00:18:36 |
xored | apparently it made sense when moving to smb3 or something, I can get that, old cruft | 00:21:06 |
samasaur | i hope that works for you but i think something else is going on | 00:21:15 |
samasaur | bc like | 00:21:17 |
samasaur | i do not have fruit:posix_rename and have been on an affected version of samba the whole time | 00:21:43 |
Randy Eckenrode | I’m planning to wait a bit before updating. | 00:21:47 |
samasaur | unless im misinterpreting you and/or the bug | 00:21:54 |
xored | fruit:posix_rename was a default | 00:22:17 |
xored | but yes if your initial backup was post 4.22.0 I don't know what's going on either | 00:22:35 |
samasaur | i really think it should have? based on the history of pkgs/servers/samba/4.x.nix, it looks like nixpkgs went to 4.22 on august 15 (plus channel propagation time ofc) | 00:23:59 |