| 5 Nov 2025 |
 Isolaryn | In reply to @colemickens:matrix.org
Is it possible to use HM to configure Ghostty on macOS even though it's not installable via nix/hm? What do you mean not installable? | 23:07:43 |
 colemickens 🏳️🌈 | I don't think it's available for aarch64-darwin | 23:08:12 |
 samasaur | ghostty doesn't build on Darwin because it needs the real (unfree) xcodebuild and/or Swift 6 | 23:08:38 |
| samasaur | I don't remember what the current blocker is off the top of my head | 23:09:05 |
| samasaur | *doesnt build via Nix | 23:09:12 |
| Isolaryn | There is a ghostty-bin package for this occasion in nixpkgs | 23:09:15 |
| Isolaryn | Unless from source is something you require | 23:09:38 |
| samasaur | yeah. personally though when the option is a binary from nixpkgs or a binary direct from the project I just download direct from the project | 23:10:27 |
| 6 Nov 2025 |
 Ihar Hrachyshka | we have the llvm patch that broke firefox aarch64 bisected: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129889
bad news is it's - probably? - not scoped to darwin and it's - probably? - affecting other apps. And it's - definitely - hard to say which are affected without running them.
wonder if it justifies a global CFLAGS edit to disable the optimization.
emily fyi
| 00:02:03 |
| Ihar Hrachyshka | * we have the llvm patch that broke firefox aarch64 bisected: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129889
bad news is it's - probably? - not scoped to darwin and it's - probably? - affecting other apps. And it's - definitely - hard to say which are affected without running them.
wonder if it justifies a global C(PP)FLAGS edit to disable the optimization.
emily fyi
| 00:04:31 |
 EsperLily [she/her] | emily: is there anything left to do on https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/455760? you approved it some time ago (and then I updated the PR since then) but I can't merge it myself | 01:06:09 |
|  @remilapeyre:matrix.org left the room. | 10:03:27 |
|  Clemens Schlipfinger joined the room. | 17:04:44 |
| 7 Nov 2025 |
|  jopejoe1 (4094@39c3) joined the room. | 10:17:24 |
| jopejoe1 (4094@39c3) | Looks like firefox 145 wants apple-sdk_26 which is not available on 25.05 could some one with more Darwin knowledge than me take a look at that?
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/459417
| 10:33:30 |
| jopejoe1 (4094@39c3) | cc @ihar.hrachyshka:matrix.org as you did most of the firefox darwin stuff | 10:40:11 |
|  titus🐼 joined the room. | 11:48:55 |
| titus🐼 left the room. | 11:54:53 |
 purrtner | If someone has a spare minute and any clue about macOS Keychain in nix build environment, I‘d love to hear from you at https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/459492 .
I‘m not really sure, how to proceed. If someone could put me in a direction, I can perhaps fix the issue myself. | 16:22:29 |
 Randy Eckenrode | Probably just disable the test. | 16:27:56 |
| purrtner | I kind of guessed something like that 🙃. I‘ll flesh something out on the weekend then, I guess. Thanks for your educated opinion | 16:39:39 |
| Randy Eckenrode | Unfortunately, disabling impure tests is usually the best we can do. | 17:06:28 |
| purrtner | If there is a chance: Do you have experience when doing that with Go Modules? I created a patch and integrated it into the build as one does with every derivation. I could not find a "more elegant" or "less invasive" solution from my not very educated view.
If you have no clue, I'll just submit the PR and we'll see, what reviewing maintainers think about it 😸 | 17:53:19 |
| purrtner | * If there is a chance: Do you have experience when doing that with Go Modules? I created a patch and integrated it into the build as one does with every derivation. I could not find a "more elegant" or "less invasive" solution from my not very educated view.
If you have no clue, I'll just submit the PR and we'll see, what reviewing maintainers think about it 😸
Edit: sorry, wanted to quickly get into the weekend 😅 | 18:11:38 |
 hexa | can we get apple-sdk_26 on 25.05 or not? | 18:15:43 |
| hexa | Randy Eckenrode, emily | 18:15:51 |
| samasaur | I think it should be fine to do that | 18:44:54 |
 niklaskorz | built samasaur's PR rebased on release-25.05, seems to work fine | 18:45:08 |
| samasaur | yeah apple-sdk_26 is entirely additive, and the whole SDK version/deployment target dance only depends on macOS version in the first place | 18:47:00 |
| Ihar Hrachyshka | I haven't looked closely into ff issue yet; I was wondering if they actually use some API that is not present in xnu sources or we can repeat a trick that we did before and pull from there. | 18:47:12 |
