| 2 Dec 2025 |
 xored | some dns crap I have no patience for right now | 00:37:31 |
 Randy Eckenrode | Do you happen to have DNS advertised only with a link-local address (no other fallbacks)? | 00:56:05 |
| xored | no I mean my nix builder has decided it can't resolve download.samba.org, so I'm now (attempting) to build on the nas itself | 00:57:02 |
| Randy Eckenrode | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/462151 | 00:57:50 |
| Randy Eckenrode | Apparently that has been reverted. It broke the daemon on my system. | 00:58:20 |
| Randy Eckenrode | Sorry, apparently https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/451579 has been reverted. | 00:58:44 |
| Randy Eckenrode | My PR fixed the link-local DNS issue, but it hasn’t even made it through a staging cycle yet. | 00:59:18 |
| xored | funny, my servers are ipv6 only, I wonder if its related somehow | 01:00:17 |
| xored | I have never heard this nas fan that loud lmaoooo | 01:03:24 |
| Randy Eckenrode | Same, but I have an unadvertised IPv4 server as a fallback. I have a list of “legacy” devices that get advertised the IPv4 server because they either don’t support IPv6 or are stupid. | 01:07:50 |
| Randy Eckenrode | Like Wi-Fi APs that think they’re offline if they don’t have an IPv4 DNS server even though though they work otherwise. | 01:08:14 |
| xored | that's a really cool approach I hadn't thought of that, I have basically 2 devices holding me up | 01:08:35 |
| xored | moment of truth | 01:08:52 |
| xored | 
Download image.png | 01:09:47 |
| xored | there goes my afternoon holy moly | 01:09:55 |
| xored | I know it's not noteworthy but I'm so pissed they didn't mention samba once on the release notes | 01:10:40 |
| xored | there was clearly a breaking change | 01:11:01 |
 samasaur | fun fact about time machine btw, it will cap at 16TB even if the share has more storage available than that | 01:11:02 |
| xored | also who ton earth does semver for samba | 01:11:14 |
| xored | * also who on earth does semver for samba | 01:11:20 |
| xored | just a minor tiny version nothing to see here | 01:11:35 |
| xored | I am yet to splash for those kind of fun facts lmao | 01:12:07 |
| samasaur | am trying to find the link explaining why | 01:12:18 |
| samasaur | but the gist is that TM uses the default band size for the sparsebundle and so the bundle caps at 16TB even though there is more storage on the actual sahre | 01:12:46 |
| samasaur | * but the gist is that TM uses the default band size for the sparsebundle and so the bundle caps at 16TB even though there is more storage on the actual share | 01:12:50 |
| samasaur | ah https://discussions.apple.com/thread/255972168?sortBy=rank | 01:13:02 |
| xored | should I even bother reporting this for them to bump to 4.22.6? | 01:13:06 |
| xored | or are we past that? | 01:13:13 |
| samasaur | you can work around it by manually creating the bundle | 01:13:14 |
| xored | not sure I follow, it is capped at some amount per backup or in total | 01:14:35 |
