!lheuhImcToQZYTQTuI:nixos.org

Nix on macOS

1170 Members
β€œThere are still many issues with the Darwin platform but most of it is quite usable.” β€” http://yves.gnu-darwin.org192 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
23 Feb 2026
@rebmit:rebmit.moerebmit[reb]
In reply to @samasaur:matrix.org

do we have a standard recommendation for how to handle meta.mainProgram/nix run compatibility for packages that produce an app bundle? I've seen:

  1. symlinking the binary to $out/bin via something like ln -s $out/{Applications/${name}.app/Contents/MacOS/${name},bin/}
  2. using makeBinaryWrapper to do something similar
  3. putting a wrapper script in $out/bin that calls open -na on the produced application bundle

Is one of these unambiguously "better" than the others? I recall the symlink approach having issues (and I can find comments in nixpkgs and on PRs to that extent), so makeBinaryWrapper seems better than that for not a lot of overhead. I vaguely recall some cases where even that approach doesn't work (properly), and see some examples in nixpkgs (libreoffice, mongodb-compass, beekeeper-studio, jetbrains, tigervnc) using open instead, but that has some other behavioral differences (such as exiting in the terminal immediately, unless we standardize on using -W). Maybe there isn't a universal right answer, but I feel like it'd be helpful to have docs either way

an example of symlink causing behavior differences I ran into recently: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/489364
06:55:25
@samasaur:matrix.orgsamasauryea that's what prompted me to ask, i have the zotero, cinny, and nheko PRs up in tabs rn06:56:06
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn Each of those approaches has more overhead than the last is worth mentioning. 08:25:20
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn Maybe also the fact that them not working might be of interest to upstream. 08:26:27
@benjaminsparks:chat.alugha.appBen Sparksconsider not setting a meta.mainProgram, then providing script aliases that point at the executables of that bundle 11:22:13
@benjaminsparks:chat.alugha.appBen Sparks let multiOutputBundle = stdenv.mkDerivation { ... }; let singleProg = writers.makeShellScript { "${multiOutputBundle}/bin/$MY-SINGLE-PROGRAM $@" } 11:23:52
@benjaminsparks:chat.alugha.appBen Sparkssomething like this perhaps?11:23:57
@rebmit:rebmit.moerebmit[reb]
In reply to @benjaminsparks:chat.alugha.app
consider not setting a meta.mainProgram, then providing script aliases that point at the executables of that bundle
i don't get it, your example seems pretty similar to using a (shell) wrapper
11:35:44
@benjaminsparks:chat.alugha.appBen Sparksexcept that you don't rebuild the multiOutputBundle when you use overrideAttrs to make a new meta.mainProgram for each program11:36:25
@benjaminsparks:chat.alugha.appBen Sparksahh im sorry i have misread the message πŸ˜„ is what I have written even helpful to you, probably not πŸ˜‚11:37:33

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6