| 31 May 2021 |
Finn Behrens | does this wording sounds good?
disable lowdown sandbox under aarch64-darwin, as nested sandbox is not supported on that platform?
| 09:31:28 |
Finn Behrens | * does this wording sounds good?
disable lowdown sandbox under aarch64-darwin, as nested sandbox is not supported on that platform
| 09:31:36 |
Domen Kožar | sgtm | 09:31:49 |
Finn Behrens | In reply to @domenkozar:matrix.org we'll want to use 21.05-small there is no branch yet. So can't do a pr for that yet | 09:32:48 |
Finn Behrens | and 20.09 has no aarch64-darwin support, so we would have to wait, or use master | 09:33:08 |
Finn Behrens | or do we want to use release-21.05? | 09:33:41 |
Domen Kožar | ah, there are no channels yet | 09:33:44 |
Domen Kožar | they will be created today | 09:33:48 |
Finn Behrens | ok, will try to remember tu to that this evening | 09:34:10 |
Domen Kožar | posted a small status update at https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/105026#issuecomment-851360515 | 09:36:07 |
Finn Behrens | I don't understood yet how to build the release tarballs with hydra. Not sure if we have to add anything else into the flake for that | 09:37:00 |
Domen Kožar | that's automatic | 09:40:17 |
Domen Kožar | we'll also need to change the installer to use the correct platform | 09:40:44 |
Finn Behrens | In reply to @domenkozar:matrix.org we'll also need to change the installer to use the correct platform this change? https://github.com/NixOS/nix/commit/5e86de3cd8c60e59ed57ca9f4b3a9aab3fca5425 | 09:52:56 |
Domen Kožar | I think it sets x86_64-darwin is used as a platform by default currently | 09:54:07 |
Finn Behrens | yes, thats whats removed on the other side, as far as i can tell | 09:54:33 |
Domen Kožar | ah! all good | 09:54:54 |
| timtraversy joined the room. | 12:26:28 |
sterni (he/him) | why does nix have a reimplementation of the lowdown package in nixpkgs anyways? | 17:08:19 |
| 1 Jun 2021 |
| [0x4A6F] changed their display name from 0x4A6F to [0x4A6F]. | 06:35:09 |
Domen Kožar | Finn Behrens: channels are out | 06:59:17 |
Mic92 | In reply to @sternenseemann:systemli.org why does nix have a reimplementation of the lowdown package in nixpkgs anyways? Historical reasons? | 07:23:33 |
sterni (he/him) | Mic92: yeah I think they added a dynamic library which we didn't have in nixpkgs for a time, but it was upstreamed at some point | 07:24:36 |
Finn Behrens | In reply to @domenkozar:matrix.org Finn Behrens: channels are out PR is created: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/4865 | 07:54:36 |
Domen Kožar | Nice :) | 07:55:32 |
Finn Behrens | do we need to add support for aarch64-darwin to nix stable? or is this not needed, as it always will be used through nixpkgs, and not like nix master through a flake | 08:09:02 |
Finn Behrens | I think it would look like this, but I'm not sure. shall i open a pr for that? | 08:12:38 |
Finn Behrens | https://github.com/Kloenk/nixos-nix/commit/75f787dce2aaa702c895e4f22a26fe713b109f81 | 08:12:39 |
Domen Kožar | that's also needed for tarball support | 08:13:54 |
Finn Behrens | So I create a pr? or did I miss some lines. Not sure what you mean by that | 08:14:54 |