| 9 Jun 2024 |
 delroth | In reply to @puck:puck.moe
because buildbot * I've run a publicly accessible buildbot instance for about 10 years and I have no clue what that's supposed to mean | 14:30:58 |
 puck | raitobezarius https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/web-services/pulls/122 - i won't be able to deploy but if it LGTY feel free to send it | 14:31:29 |
| puck | In reply to @delroth:delroth.net
I've run a publicly accessible buildbot instance for about 10 years and I have no clue what that's supposed to mean iirc we were looking at the buildbot auth stuff and didn't want to take the time to set it up properly just yet | 14:31:48 |
 raitobezarius | In reply to @puck:puck.moe
raitobezarius https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/web-services/pulls/122 - i won't be able to deploy but if it LGTY feel free to send it sent, deploying it | 14:32:26 |
| raitobezarius | i'm also looking at setting the proper authz | 14:32:41 |
| raitobezarius | but maybe medium term | 14:32:46 |
| delroth | fwiw having anonymous access enabled would also solve the terrible UX of not being able to see CI checks on gerrit half of the time | 14:33:11 |
| raitobezarius | it's not clear to me how buildbot OAuth2 stuff will "receive" the roles | 14:33:14 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @delroth:delroth.net
fwiw having anonymous access enabled would also solve the terrible UX of not being able to see CI checks on gerrit half of the time hence why i would like to remove the whole proxy | 14:33:31 |
| raitobezarius | maybe we should just start with admins have all rights and anonymous access then grow this thing | 14:34:40 |
| raitobezarius |
[ERROR] stderr) > Error: Build error: Failed installing third-party/lua-resty-hmac/lib/resty/hmac.lua in /nix/store/7dlq3p27qrj2sc42jd5l13b0bm2d95my-luajit2.1-lua-resty-jwt-0.2.3-0/lua-resty-jwt-0.2.3-0-rocks/lua-resty-jwt/0.2.3-0/lua/resty/hmac.lua: Failed copying third-party/lua-resty-hmac/lib/resty/hmac.lua to /nix/store/7dlq3p27qrj2sc42jd5l13b0bm2d95my-luajit2.1-lua-resty-jwt-0.2.3-0/lua-resty-jwt-0.2.3-0-rocks/lua-resty-jwt/0.2.3-0/lua/resty/hmac.lua
| 14:36:41 |
| raitobezarius | hm | 14:36:42 |
| raitobezarius | vendoring hits again | 14:45:46 |
| raitobezarius | ok deployed delroth let me know if you see improvements in the next hours | 14:48:37 |
| delroth | thank you! | 14:50:46 |
| raitobezarius | you're welcome! | 14:51:51 |
| raitobezarius | https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/buildbot-nix/pulls/16 | 15:02:13 |
| raitobezarius | cc puck ^ | 15:02:17 |
| raitobezarius | (untested yet) | 15:02:41 |
| raitobezarius | companion infra PR once we validate the design of #16: https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/web-services/pulls/124 | 15:11:19 |
 jade_ | In reply to @ma27:nicht-so.sexy
last week I didn't have time for Lix hacking, so I may be a little out of date, but are you aware of error: 'xonsh-unwrapped' was incorporated into xonsh code; call xonsh directly instead. when opening the devshell?
worked around it by doing what the error told me, but don't really know if that even makes sense (and this was purely to get my env back up), so asking here first :) FUCK | 22:12:46 |
| jade_ | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/317636 self merge time, wait for a channel update | 22:13:12 |
| jade_ | im firing off a backport of that too | 22:13:31 |
| jade_ | In reply to @julia:the-apothecary.club
that's a nixpkgs update, not lix, see pkgs/top-level/aliases.nix yes, and furthermore there is essentially no workaround to this | 22:14:18 |
| jade_ | besides whatever crimes Qyriad told me she did | 22:14:28 |
| jade_ | i was miffed when i found out and i kinda you know, reverted it :P | 22:14:47 |
| 10 Jun 2024 |
| jade_ | reverting the 24.05 upgrade since it regressed a bunch of stuff and only passed CI because our CI allows eval failures for bad reasons: https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/1432 | 04:31:51 |
| jade_ | we should release 2.90 and rework it | 04:32:42 |
| jade_ | (ideally i would like to release 2.91 in like a month, and we can have another go on main after branch-off) | 04:49:24 |
| jade_ | * (ideally i would like to release 2.91 in like a month, and we can have another go on main after branch-off of 2.90) | 04:54:28 |
