!lymvtcwDJ7ZA9Npq:lix.systems

Lix Development

395 Members
(Technical) development of Lix, the package manager, a Nix implementation. Please be mindful of ongoing technical conversations in this channel.134 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
7 Oct 2025
@just1602:systemli.orgjust1602Indeed, someone turned off iov620:10:14
@just1602:systemli.orgjust1602* Indeed, someone turned off ipv620:10:22
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius just1602: should work now cc Katalin 🔪 20:11:06
@just1602:systemli.orgjust1602Ipv4 is now working20:11:13
@saiko:knifepoint.netKatalin 🔪 yup! 20:11:17
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusawesome20:11:35
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusfeel free to ping me if anything goes wrong20:11:39
9 Oct 2025
@colin:uninsane.orgColin joined the room.02:11:57
@commentator2.0:elia.gardenRutile (Commentator2.0) feel free to pinghttps://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/4209?tab=checks for some reason the darwin test is timing out? is anyone else experiencing this issue?16:22:59
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI see it on my tests, it's spurious16:24:43
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI think the machine is a VM and is heavy loaded and we got massive CPU steal16:24:52
@commentator2.0:elia.gardenRutile (Commentator2.0) feel free to pinglikely caused by this commit (at least that's where we first saw this occur) https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/421216:27:17
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI think I saw it before but not sure16:27:32
@commentator2.0:elia.gardenRutile (Commentator2.0) feel free to pingand it got merged despite some failed tests (no clue how it still had the +1 on verified)16:27:35
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusNo, those are HEAD failed tests16:27:54
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusnot pre-merge failed tests16:27:56
@commentator2.0:elia.gardenRutile (Commentator2.0) feel free to pinghmm16:28:07
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI retried your tests16:28:46
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusIf they don't pass deterministically (timed out again)16:28:51
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusWe can analyze16:28:52
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusBut I honestly think it's high CPU steal on the macOS VM16:28:59
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusWe don't have monitoring there alas16:29:03
@commentator2.0:elia.gardenRutile (Commentator2.0) feel free to ping raitobezarius: exact same bug: it has +1 despite tests still running and / or having failed https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/4209?tab=checks 17:53:45
@commentator2.0:elia.gardenRutile (Commentator2.0) feel free to pinghttps://buildkite.com/lix-project/lix/builds/5091#0199c9c9-d727-4e77-9646-27621f5ed12e17:54:20
@philiptaron:matrix.orgPhilip Taron (UTC-8) On [builtins.warn](https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix/issues/579): I see the CL from 10 months ago stalled out. Is there anything new in the Lix team thinking since then other than:

  1. Make a new exception type

  2. Don't use an environment variable

  3. What the hell is going on with cached eval failures


That's what I surmised from reading the CL and issue.
18:57:48
@somasis:matrix.orgsomasis joined the room.19:00:19
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariuscan you try to order a revert of the suspected commit and rerun the CI for you?19:45:15
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusThere's unaddressed comments on the CL, hence why it stalled19:45:46
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusAh, I understood19:46:33
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusThat's terrifying :(19:46:36

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10