!lymvtcwDJ7ZA9Npq:lix.systems

Lix Development

416 Members
(Technical) development of Lix, the package manager, a Nix implementation. Please be mindful of ongoing technical conversations in this channel.139 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
10 Sep 2025
@cpli:fairydust.spacecpli changed their profile picture.06:36:45
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilydoes 25.05 need 2.94? if it released today then it'd only be usable for ~3½ months and only benefit people explicitly opting in, and I assume it won't release today18:35:55
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily not sure what you mean by the patch, but backporting toml11_4 seems fine to me 18:36:06
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilybut orthogonal to getting the bump in on unstable which is currently blocking CMake 418:36:18
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily I don't think we need a 2.93 release because the merged fixes can just be patched downstream, but I do need to know how soon the other releases are actually going to be dropped 18:36:57
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusThis week is a bit complicated for me18:37:47
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI will see what I can do this evening18:37:51
@aloisw:julia0815.dealoisw It already has it in the form of lixPackageSets.git. 18:38:23
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius aloisw I will try to get to your cherry-picks ASAP, thanks a lot 18:38:36
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilythe toml11 cherry-picks should probably not be merged to pre-2.9318:38:51
@aloisw:julia0815.dealoisw Toml11 bump revert patch that's currently lingering in the lixPackageSets.git update PR. 18:38:54
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyif the plan is still as stated18:38:54
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI guess I'm too out of the loop then to be a useful reviewer18:39:23
@aloisw:julia0815.dealoiswThe ones I requested Raito on are only CI unblock.18:39:28
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI thought the agreed on plan was dropping 2.91 and 2.92?18:39:41
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyfrom 25.1118:39:43
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusYes, I'm talking about the cherry-picks that alois requested me on cl.lix.systems18:39:54
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyah, okay18:39:55
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius(I should be more explicit in context, it's my bad)18:40:09
@aloisw:julia0815.dealoisw(that is, bumping nixpkgs to a recent enough 25.05 to not fail to evaluate the test on host nix with toml11 4)18:40:13
@aloisw:julia0815.dealoisw raitobezarius 2.91 is already finished, the macOS thing is prerequisite for the C++23 bump. 18:42:08
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius aloisw you should be unblocked 18:44:04
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusthanks for taking care of this18:44:10
@aloisw:julia0815.dealoiswThank you for the reviews, I have merged on all supported branches (2.91, 2.92, 2.93, main) now so CI should be unblocked.18:45:06
@aloisw:julia0815.dealoiswtoml11 support changes on 2.93 will need rebase and code owner override approval.18:46:42
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily FWIW, it will only be broken by the next staging-next, so it is also an option to just let them break on staging for now and remove them before that lands 18:46:48
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusI'm looking at killing 2.9218:47:36
@tsandrini:matrix.orgtsandrini (any/all) changed their display name from tsandrini to tsandrini (any/all).18:54:26
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius emily i think i did the job, please don't hesitate to mention me if I missed something 19:10:47
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilywill take a look later, thank you!19:51:41

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10