| 14 Oct 2025 |
 K900 | Yes but also ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh | 16:28:21 |
 raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | emily: Are you satisfied with the Lix proposal? I'm going to context switch to another thing | 16:28:25 |
| K900 | Like the endpoint will probably be an FOD | 16:28:28 |
| K900 | And FODs accept both | 16:28:34 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | Do you know when would you like this to happen? | 16:28:35 |
| K900 | And should continue to accept both IMO | 16:28:39 |
 emily | well, we are here because convertHash is not desired and I said the main way I can imagine decomposing it is to split out SRI/<hash>:<algo> parsing, and to split conversion/deconversion using NUL bytes in strings | 16:28:38 |
| K900 | Like all the uses of convertHash I'm seeing right now are "convert to SRI and shove it in a FOD" | 16:29:17 |
| * raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) is not going to debate the need of convertHash or not for end user code | 16:28:59 |
