Lix Development | 416 Members | |
| (Technical) development of Lix, the package manager, a Nix implementation. Please be mindful of ongoing technical conversations in this channel. | 140 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Aug 2025 | ||
In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.orgEvaling one Lix should be quite cheap though? | 16:48:19 | |
In reply to @aloisw:julia0815.deYeah, I didn't mean this as this would be much more expensive | 16:48:44 | |
| but cost for x86(after) > cost for x86(before) | 16:48:54 | |
| maybe by epsilon | 16:48:56 | |
| I am fully ready to commit crimes to make this happen and Lix won't even be the worst of them | 16:49:53 | |
| I am making a thing to forward logind wakelocks from WSL to Windows | 16:50:06 | |
| It is going to be VERY CURSED and I don't care | 16:50:20 | |
| raitobezarius: how do i read this? https://buildkite.com/lix-project/lix/builds/3673/steps/canvas?sid=01986f84-2c33-4e02-9c8e-6ad9e83250c9 | 18:34:58 | |
| ma27: currenlty rebasing the nix framework rewrite and now your test is failing... there is a chance the code is broken and not the framework but not 100% sure, could you take a look at it? https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/3333/ | 18:50:36 | |
| can you link me a ci failure, please? | 19:05:00 | |
| ci currently has issues with some of the changes
the relevant error log(?) | 19:15:21 | |
| ok its starting to build now | 19:16:50 | |
| uhhhh i guess it works on the build machine?! | 19:28:02 | |
| I repeatedly get now
from
(yes, there's a chmod in the shell available and I killed the entire temp dir before) so something looks pretty off here | 20:04:10 | |
| are you using darwin? otherwise do a just clean & just setup & just install | 20:04:42 | |
ah and I misread the buildlog from the previous nix build of my checkout, it's not reproducible from within. | 20:05:08 | |
In reply to @commentator2.0:elia.gardennope, linux. let me try... | 20:05:57 | |
| same result for me. | 20:14:10 | |
| can you check if it is a code/implementation issue and one from the functional2 framework? | 20:16:11 | |
| * can you check if it is a code/implementation issue and not one from the functional2 framework? | 20:16:19 | |
| so, the quickfix to make the test green again:
this is obviously not what we want, but this confirms that the Command/Env machinery is misbehaving here. No idea why I saw no complaints in the sandbox build though 🤷 | 20:22:49 | |