| 7 Sep 2025 |
 emily | so nobody ever tried to eval lib tests with 2.3 on 24.11 or 25.05, at least as the host Nix | 14:19:49 |
 aloisw | In reply to @aloisw:julia0815.de
Let's see whether https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/4142 succeeds in CI, I will post backports to all supported releases if it does. It succeeds now and should unblock CI on main again. | 19:40:22 |
| emily | this will update over the nixfmt bump I think? | 21:09:25 |
| emily | so the Nix files should probably get reformatted | 21:09:37 |
| emily | oh | 21:10:02 |
| emily | you did whoops | 21:10:04 |
| emily | I remembered the diff being bigger when I inadvertently did it | 21:10:23 |
| 8 Sep 2025 |
|  Federico Damián Schonborn (he/they) changed their display name from Mr. Bones (he/they) to Federico Damián Schonborn (he/they). | 00:29:27 |
| aloisw | In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
you did whoops If I didn't CI would fail due to the "pre-commit" check. (Yes I learned that the hard way.) | 05:08:48 |
 raitobezarius | (I'm sorry, I'm unable to catch up with this room, so I don't know if there's anything that people are blocked on a core team member or just an active committer, please mention me if so.) | 14:39:25 |
| aloisw | For main the change needs to be stamped by someone with +2 access. Release branches will need code owner override in addition (I will need to fix the CI failures first though, 2.93 and 2.92 are probably flakes but 2.91 needs more effort). | 15:28:31 |
| aloisw | Ok 2.93 was a flake, it is verified now. | 15:29:11 |
| aloisw | The CI unblock stacks are now finished (modulo nix-copy flakes) and review requested from people I believe to have sufficient permission on all branches. | 19:08:22 |
| emily | does anyone have any idea why functional-shell is so flaky | 19:21:17 |
| emily | I'm consistently failing to build it on my branch on Linux to the point where I'm starting to question whether I somehow broke it | 19:21:31 |
| 9 Sep 2025 |
| raitobezarius | I know why functional-repl is like this | 12:37:39 |
