!lymvtcwDJ7ZA9Npq:lix.systems

Lix Development

415 Members
(Technical) development of Lix, the package manager, a Nix implementation. Please be mindful of ongoing technical conversations in this channel.139 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
3 Aug 2025
@helle:tacobelllabs.nethelle (just a stray cat girl)* according to jade and myself it most likely is a bug in the machinery and we don't have any test suite coverage for it and we need to add the machinery for it 05:12:37
@helle:tacobelllabs.nethelle (just a stray cat girl)(machinery being testing bad and weird http states, which due to how deeply we configure and add hooks to curl in lix, have failure modes not seen in curl itself05:13:57
@k900:0upti.meK900I have a stupid(?) idea07:46:54
@k900:0upti.meK900Should I duct tape systemd-inhibit to the build hook07:48:50
@helle:tacobelllabs.nethelle (just a stray cat girl)needs discussing, but is reasonable to consider 07:54:54
@k900:0upti.meK900Oh no logind doesn't have a C API for this07:56:51
@jade_:matrix.orgjade_no, because the build hook rejects if it's going to do a local build, so you have no idea whether a nix build is actively running08:39:53
@linus:schreibt.jetztLinux Hackermanso I've fixed cross-compilation (and the issue where I reported that it was broken was labelled as a release blocker). Would it make sense to add at least one cross build to CI, so it doesn't get broken by accident again? Or is that too costly?15:36:43
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusgo ahead16:19:30
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusadd it16:19:31
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariuswe are a bit strained on x86 but that shall change soon I suppose16:19:41
@just1602:systemli.orgjust1602I was thinking about lix CI while listening to a podcast where someone from 0xide mention that a full rack has 2000 CPU core, 32TB of RAM and something like 250TB of storage.16:22:02
@just1602:systemli.orgjust1602I was like, just half a rack would be enough to fix all our CI issues16:22:12
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariushahahahaha16:22:16
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusbut we don't have millions of euros on our hand alas16:22:22
@just1602:systemli.orgjust1602At some point, I hope they're gonna have enough client to sponsor some nice opensourc projects :D16:23:57
@aloisw:julia0815.dealoisw
In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
we are a bit strained on x86 but that shall change soon I suppose
If you have enough aarch64 then I guess you could also do aarch64 -> x86_64 cross?
16:42:09
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius we do have more aarch64 16:42:20
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusat least, x86 is doing more work than aarch6416:42:25

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10