!lymvtcwDJ7ZA9Npq:lix.systems

Lix Development

423 Members
(Technical) development of Lix, the package manager, a Nix implementation. Please be mindful of ongoing technical conversations in this channel.143 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
31 Jul 2025
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily well there are test failures on some of the commits but the __structuredAttrs bug prevents the CI log from being useful at all 22:04:46
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyoh I also didn't request reviewers for the https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/3834/7 stack22:05:27
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilywhich would fix that22:05:32
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI'll do it later22:05:39
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily(oh, well actually that part got merged… so I have no idea what is going on and will have to look into it later)22:06:33
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariuspackaging wise22:34:48
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusjust put qyriad22:34:50
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (Qyriad don't hate me :D) 22:34:54
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusthis can be expedited22:34:59
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyunfortunately the error logs should already get fixed so I'm confused :) I'll take a look in a bit though22:37:35
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyis there a reason to have codeowner request as an explicit step rather than automatic?22:37:51
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyaside from whether the step is CL or stack at once22:38:00
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusi am confused because I'm almost certain there must be an automatic thing22:38:32
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusbut maybe Google has a secret plugin22:38:41
1 Aug 2025
@k900:0upti.meK900 @raitobezarius any reason I'm r?'d on those two changes 04:53:32
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius
In reply to @k900:0upti.me
@raitobezarius any reason I'm r?'d on those two changes
because you are code owner and the plugin distribute load :P
13:08:43
@weethet:catgirl.cloudWeetHetIs clang-format not enforced? I have format-on-save on and have run into code changing multiple times by now13:18:50
@weethet:catgirl.cloudWeetHetCould we just pull the plug and reformat the whole database?13:19:05
@piegames:flausch.socialpiegamesThat would make cross-porting patches impossible, unfortunately13:33:54
@weethet:catgirl.cloudWeetHet
In reply to @piegames:flausch.social
That would make cross-porting patches impossible, unfortunately
Aren't there tools for ast-based merging?
13:34:47
@weethet:catgirl.cloudWeetHethttps://mergiraf.org/13:35:02
@piegames:flausch.socialpiegamesI've tried out Mergiraf when it was fresh, and I'd say that it's not ready yet13:35:33
@weethet:catgirl.cloudWeetHetI have it set as my merge tool, it seems okay13:36:09
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius
In reply to @weethet:catgirl.cloud
Could we just pull the plug and reformat the whole database?
Nope
13:47:20
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius
In reply to @weethet:catgirl.cloud
Is clang-format not enforced? I have format-on-save on and have run into code changing multiple times by now
You should consider using *git-*clang-format
13:47:40
@weethet:catgirl.cloudWeetHetWouldn't I end up with the code that doesn't match the code style of the rest of the database?13:49:57
@weethet:catgirl.cloudWeetHet Which is even worse 13:50:07
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusNo, the goal is to have progressive reformatting of the codebase13:50:34
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusOnce every pieces have been touched, the codebase will be formatted.13:50:44
@charles:computer.surgeryCharlesFun fact, clang-format formatting is not stable between versions13:54:59

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10