| 11 Nov 2025 |
 raitobezarius | aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah | 18:52:30 |
 Winter | for god knows what reason | 18:52:32 |
| Winter | lol | 18:52:32 |
| Winter | ok thanks | 18:52:35 |
| raitobezarius | :D | 18:52:39 |
| Winter | i'll submit some PRs then ^^ | 18:52:41 |
| raitobezarius | thanks! | 18:52:45 |
 Taeer Bar-Yam | yeah, checking real-world cases is essential, but there is also something more pernicious about relying on false-y values than true-y values. if we throw out any notion of function equality, we break code that more reasonably relies on true-y values too. | 19:05:07 |
| raitobezarius | Yeah, this is a tradeoff decision | 19:28:32 |
 Rutile (Commentator2.0) feel free to ping | Li: am kinda curious: when will lix officially break bug compatibility and finally fix them? | 19:29:24 |
 delroth | FYI: git.lix.systems might have some short unavailability in the next hour or so while I push a security update | 19:32:41 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @commentator2.0:elia.garden
Li: am kinda curious: when will lix officially break bug compatibility and finally fix them? I don't know | 19:45:42 |
| raitobezarius | All of this is very langver shaped and we don't have langver | 19:45:54 |
| delroth | (done) | 19:46:49 |
| 12 Nov 2025 |
| raitobezarius | pennae made progress on pointer equality and expanded all known cases we have in mind: https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/4556/3/tests/functional2/lang/eq/in-pointer-equality.nix | 12:40:46 |
