| 31 Jul 2025 |
 raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | thank you! | 21:44:29 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | emily can you add the code owneras reviewers with the "suggest owners" button? | 21:45:16 |
 emily | can I uhh | 21:45:38 |
| emily | do that for the whole stack at once? | 21:45:41 |
| emily | or do I have to do it for every single CL | 21:45:44 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | let me check | 21:46:36 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | yeah no i think you'd need to add it for every CL but we definitely need to look into something to make it easier | 21:47:44 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | it's fine, you don't have to do it i will handle this | 21:47:53 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | in the future, if you know in advance who should be the reviewers you can just do -o r=raito -o r=pennae | 21:50:11 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | this will put us reviewers for all the stack | 21:50:18 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | if i don't put it in my dashboards, i will forget it | 21:50:26 |
|  outhback joined the room. | 21:55:24 |
| outhback set a profile picture. | 21:58:30 |
| emily | thanks for handling it :) | 22:00:18 |
| emily | well there are test failures on some of the commits but the __structuredAttrs bug prevents the CI log from being useful at all | 22:04:46 |
| emily | oh I also didn't request reviewers for the https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/3834/7 stack | 22:05:27 |
| emily | which would fix that | 22:05:32 |
| emily | I'll do it later | 22:05:39 |
| emily | (oh, well actually that part got merged… so I have no idea what is going on and will have to look into it later) | 22:06:33 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | packaging wise | 22:34:48 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | just put qyriad | 22:34:50 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | (Qyriad don't hate me :D) | 22:34:54 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | this can be expedited | 22:34:59 |
| emily | unfortunately the error logs should already get fixed so I'm confused :) I'll take a look in a bit though | 22:37:35 |
| emily | is there a reason to have codeowner request as an explicit step rather than automatic? | 22:37:51 |
| emily | aside from whether the step is CL or stack at once | 22:38:00 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | i am confused because I'm almost certain there must be an automatic thing | 22:38:32 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | but maybe Google has a secret plugin | 22:38:41 |
| 1 Aug 2025 |
 K900 | @raitobezarius any reason I'm r?'d on those two changes | 04:53:32 |
| raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | In reply to @k900:0upti.me
@raitobezarius any reason I'm r?'d on those two changes because you are code owner and the plugin distribute load :P | 13:08:43 |
