!lymvtcwDJ7ZA9Npq:lix.systems

Lix Development

419 Members
(Technical) development of Lix, the package manager, a Nix implementation. Please be mindful of ongoing technical conversations in this channel.141 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
31 Jul 2025
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (DECT: 7248)
In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
is the idea that it will be set from outside the worker? or only consumed outside of it?
It's the idea of having a build context
18:03:34
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (DECT: 7248)That can be inherited from RPC and so on18:03:43
@jade_:matrix.orgjade_it is especially interesting for when you just want flake pinning but have a giant repo and don't care about the exact contents of what is copied into the store in a repo e.g. if you are doing leaf packages or a dev shell or w/e18:14:57
@jade_:matrix.orgjade_it reduces the time for every single nix command to run by 10s+ at work18:15:15
@jade_:matrix.orgjade_or on nixpkgs18:15:18
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyput up a big stack to fix https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix/issues/913 and clean up a bunch of stuff :)21:40:27
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (DECT: 7248)thank you!21:44:29
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (DECT: 7248) emily can you add the code owneras reviewers with the "suggest owners" button? 21:45:16
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilycan I uhh21:45:38
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilydo that for the whole stack at once?21:45:41
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyor do I have to do it for every single CL21:45:44
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (DECT: 7248)let me check21:46:36
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (DECT: 7248)yeah no i think you'd need to add it for every CL but we definitely need to look into something to make it easier21:47:44
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (DECT: 7248)it's fine, you don't have to do it i will handle this21:47:53
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (DECT: 7248) in the future, if you know in advance who should be the reviewers you can just do -o r=raito -o r=pennae 21:50:11
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (DECT: 7248)this will put us reviewers for all the stack21:50:18
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (DECT: 7248)if i don't put it in my dashboards, i will forget it21:50:26
@outhback:matrix.orgouthback joined the room.21:55:24
@outhback:matrix.orgouthback set a profile picture.21:58:30
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilythanks for handling it :)22:00:18
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily well there are test failures on some of the commits but the __structuredAttrs bug prevents the CI log from being useful at all 22:04:46
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyoh I also didn't request reviewers for the https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/3834/7 stack22:05:27
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilywhich would fix that22:05:32
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI'll do it later22:05:39
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily(oh, well actually that part got merged… so I have no idea what is going on and will have to look into it later)22:06:33
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (DECT: 7248)packaging wise22:34:48
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (DECT: 7248)just put qyriad22:34:50
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (DECT: 7248) (Qyriad don't hate me :D) 22:34:54
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (DECT: 7248)this can be expedited22:34:59
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyunfortunately the error logs should already get fixed so I'm confused :) I'll take a look in a bit though22:37:35

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10