| 18 Nov 2025 |
 John Ericson | Edef has mentioned preference for ASN.1, that is fine with me | 18:25:17 |
| John Ericson | * Edef has mentioned a preference for ASN.1, that is fine with me | 18:25:42 |
 puck | mhm; i have some thoughts on this | 18:28:02 |
| puck | (but have had some trouble wording the ideas properly; i'll give it another try this weekend) | 18:29:26 |
 Martin Schwaighofer | Congrats on the release! 🥳
I think the breaking changes in the release notes might be missing the removal of the `ca-derivations` experimental feature. 🤔 | 18:32:18 |
 raitobezarius | The last section does say that there's removal in 2.94 albeit it's worded bizzarely, the blog post does not make an explicit mention and I should add it probably, it was already deprecated in 2.93.1 so | 18:34:00 |
| John Ericson | you may wish to take a look at the DerivationOptions type I've added to Nix | 18:48:15 |
| John Ericson | I think our AST is getting pretty good shape, which can help narrow the scope for the choice of what is the concrete canonical message to sign | 18:49:15 |
 piegames | https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/4605 🎉 | 18:51:37 |
| puck | well, i mean, i have Opinions on what is represented in a .drv, and really, what the usecase of a .drv is | 18:53:52 |
| John Ericson | happy to hear them, too! | 19:05:05 |
| John Ericson | I have some desugaring code pulled out of the builder also, for things like structuredAttrs and passAsFile | 19:05:33 |
| John Ericson | * I have some desugaring code pulled out of the builder also, for things like structured attrs and passAsFile | 19:05:38 |
| raitobezarius | don't forget to update me if you need the sheriff on some CLs | 19:07:21 |
| piegames | now that the chain is back to regular size it seems to be working fine enough, but will do | 19:08:43 |
| raitobezarius | i'm building a chromium fwiw | 19:09:16 |
 Rutile (Commentator2.0) feel free to ping | 
Download image.png | 19:16:04 |
| Rutile (Commentator2.0) feel free to ping | uhh who forgot to update the precommit hook? | 19:16:12 |
| Rutile (Commentator2.0) feel free to ping | as we are in the 2.95 cycle | 19:16:27 |
| raitobezarius | i don't understand how this error arise | 19:24:07 |
| raitobezarius | did you specify an unprefixed issue number? | 19:24:13 |
| raitobezarius | no one did the work to remove that exception and turn unprefixed issue number into fj#xxx reference | 19:24:36 |
| raitobezarius | but it's a 4 lines fix :P | 19:24:48 |
 aloisw | In principle yes, but today I'm too tired so it will have to wait until tomorrow. | 19:36:36 |
| aloisw | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/455756 should have all prerequisites on the dependency side so just the attribute needs to be added if someone else wants to do it faster. | 19:37:15 |
| raitobezarius | np! | 19:37:39 |
| raitobezarius | i will see if i have it in me | 19:38:15 |
| Rutile (Commentator2.0) feel free to ping | yep, because i didn't know one needs to prefix them '^^
and according to the error msg i shouldn't need to anymore ;þ | 19:55:16 |
| raitobezarius | choose your adventure :> | 19:55:45 |
| raitobezarius | you have the privilege (i didn't have it) to fix it or to just fj# it | 19:55:57 |
