| 24 Nov 2025 |
 helle (just a stray cat girl) | I can dig up the earlier conversation at some point and should make it an issue or idk move it to zulip, anyway | 13:09:31 |
 Rutile (Commentator2.0) feel free to ping | zulip and/or issue sounds sensible | 13:10:22 |
 piegames | Hm, do we want a Zulip channel for Gerrit? | 15:04:18 |
 raitobezarius | Infra maybe | 15:19:44 |
| piegames | Uhm raitobezarius | 22:47:25 |
| piegames | I appreciate you submitting these changes but they were not fully ready yet | 22:47:37 |
| raitobezarius | Yes? | 22:47:40 |
| piegames | lacking release notes for example | 22:47:44 |
| piegames | and more tests | 22:47:50 |
| piegames | (my bad for not marking them as draft) | 22:48:02 |
| raitobezarius | Apologies for that, I was in a "submit routine" because too many changes are sent | 22:48:12 |
| piegames | oh and also they were awaiting a flaker run :D | 22:48:24 |
| raitobezarius | Next time, I won't touch your changes unless you give me an explicit request | 22:49:13 |
| piegames | if not for the Flaker run I'd go with a fixup commit, but given that I currently don't even know if Nixpkgs still evaluates with them (probably?) I think a revert might be preferable | 22:49:36 |
| raitobezarius | Do you think it's that time sensitive? | 22:50:02 |
| piegames | I have no clue | 22:50:10 |
| Rutile (Commentator2.0) feel free to ping | What happens when one pushes to a already merged cl? /cur | 22:50:13 |
| raitobezarius | I can send a revert if you think so, but I'd imagine that we can be optimistic here | 22:50:15 |
| piegames | but also on my way to bed now so I won't do anything anymore | 22:50:22 |
| Rutile (Commentator2.0) feel free to ping | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
Do you think it's that time sensitive? Flaker is currently broken for unknown reasons | 22:50:25 |
| piegames | maybe ask horrors for a second opinion? | 22:50:34 |
| raitobezarius | Then, I believe that being optimistic about it is not too bad? | 22:50:37 |
| raitobezarius | I will upgrade and check things | 22:50:41 |
| piegames | Either way, I want a merge queue so that you don't have to be in the loop for submitting any changes anymore in the first place | 22:51:13 |
| raitobezarius | Yes, I want a merge queue too and 96 hours long days | 22:51:33 |
| raitobezarius | :P | 22:51:43 |
| piegames | seriously though, anything we can do to prioritize that? | 22:51:56 |
| raitobezarius | If somefew can take off my load, then, yes | 22:53:02 |
| raitobezarius | Or if somefew can write a merge queue by themselves, too, but I think we do not have the resources currently to accelerate things | 22:53:21 |
| Rutile (Commentator2.0) feel free to ping | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
If somefew can take off my load, then, yes Any other load we::rutile can help with? | 22:53:58 |
