!lymvtcwDJ7ZA9Npq:lix.systems

Lix Development

422 Members
(Technical) development of Lix, the package manager, a Nix implementation. Please be mindful of ongoing technical conversations in this channel.141 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
12 Nov 2025
@ma27:nicht-so.sexyma27(only speaking for lix here, but n-e-j does probably the same, that's no change from us iirc)20:00:45
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinter i don't see this at all? 20:01:33
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinteri only see a handler for going from passed arg -> int20:01:40
@ma27:nicht-so.sexyma27blargh good evening I misread the question20:02:20
@ma27:nicht-so.sexyma27apologies20:02:26
@ma27:nicht-so.sexyma27one sec20:02:27
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinter:-)20:02:36
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinter yeah setting --workers [n>1] makes this speed along 20:03:09
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinterand i actually see 4 workers being spawned20:03:19
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinterand my memory+cpu being hammered20:03:29
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinter😉20:03:34
@ma27:nicht-so.sexyma27but, what are you referring to in the readme? afaiu it doesn't say something else (or rather, nothing on the default), no?20:06:53
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinter
By default, nix-eval-jobs spawns as many worker processes as there are hardware threads in the system and limits the memory usage for each worker to 4GB.
20:07:22
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinter
By default, nix-eval-jobs spawns as many worker processes as there are hardware threads in the system and limits the memory usage for each worker to 4GB.
20:07:30
@ma27:nicht-so.sexyma27ah right.20:08:51
@ma27:nicht-so.sexyma27yeah no you're right.20:09:17
@ma27:nicht-so.sexyma27feel free to file a cl :)20:09:21

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10