!lymvtcwDJ7ZA9Npq:lix.systems

Lix Development

410 Members
(Technical) development of Lix, the package manager, a Nix implementation. Please be mindful of ongoing technical conversations in this channel.135 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
11 Dec 2025
@kloenk:kloenk.eukloenk * 12:02:23
12 Dec 2025
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusFWIW, Lix got an update on the Gerrit CI, we are now using proper scheduled icons for jobs03:06:21
@whispers:catgirl.cloudwhispers (it/fae) changed their profile picture.04:51:14
13 Dec 2025
@elec3137:matrix.org@elec3137:matrix.org changed their display name from Electria to moved to: @electria:federated.nexus.05:04:17
@elec3137:matrix.org@elec3137:matrix.org removed their profile picture.06:57:21
@elec3137:matrix.org@elec3137:matrix.org removed their display name moved to: @electria:federated.nexus.06:57:30
@elec3137:matrix.org@elec3137:matrix.org left the room.06:57:48
@aloisw:julia0815.dealoisw raitobezarius did you have time to look at the SQLite changes yet? 13:10:30
16 May 2024
@aciceri:nixos.devzrsk joined the room.13:54:49
@samrose:matrix.orgsamrose
In reply to @lunaphied:lunaphied.me
I think there were a few CLs on the Gerrit but nothing being actively worked
The other thing that I could do if it helps is test things and try to find bugs. I did do some C++ work in the past, but may lack the time to do it justice here at least for about 30 days or so
15:55:29
@qyriad:katesiria.orgQyriadwe are not in any rush 🙂17:20:53
@samrose:matrix.orgsamroseWould it help to also test out the existing Lix code and try to find issues/bugs etc?17:23:21
@qyriad:katesiria.orgQyriadabsolutely17:23:41
@samrose:matrix.orgsamrose
  • how do people feel about the existing test suite that comes along with nix source code or Lix?
17:23:48
@qyriad:katesiria.orgQyriadit's pitiful17:24:10
@samrose:matrix.orgsamroseheh 17:24:16
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusexpanding it is cool17:24:23
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariuswriting new tests for builtins which are not tested17:24:30
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusnew test behaviors, etc.17:24:32
@qyriad:katesiria.orgQyriad we have three flavors of test:
  1. gtest (offer only available in libexpr and libutil)

  2. bash script

  3. virtual machine


the vast, vast majority of testing is in the "bash script" flavor and it is a mess
17:25:01
@samrose:matrix.orgsamroseI was just going to ask on the "functional" tests: do we still like using bash there?17:25:56
@samrose:matrix.orgsamrosethe last time that I worked on a major nix related cli project that used bash, or bats for testing, over time it became rather kind of hard to maintain17:26:42
@samrose:matrix.orgsamroseI am not usually a big python fan, but in that project we heard from some in the Rust community that they actually use Python to test CLI and seem to have success there. 17:27:59
@qyriad:katesiria.orgQyriadno gods please kill bash testing. the problem is that it's kind of really difficult to migrate an entire test suite and be sure that you actually migrated the test suite correctly and won't lose coverage accidentally in the process, which makes any kind of migration a bit nerve wracking17:28:36
@samrose:matrix.orgsamroseyes it's a rather large undertaking17:28:52
@samrose:matrix.orgsamrosecould be done in chunks17:28:59
@qyriad:katesiria.orgQyriad at the very least though, it would be wonderful to have an option for new tests to not just be a mess of bash 17:29:17
@samrose:matrix.orgsamroseyes it could be to choose a new approach that this community is truly happy with, rewrite some of the old tests, use it for all new, and then over time rewrite all old17:30:00
@qyriad:katesiria.orgQyriadyeah17:30:31
@samrose:matrix.orgsamroseand also probably you all would want to speak into the testing paradigm to make sure the tests are relevant17:30:52

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10