| 15 Jul 2025 |
 raitobezarius | In reply to @aloisw:julia0815.de
Also we might need to nest the build directory in a not world-executable path to prevent the builder from allowing external processes to place sockets into it? Can you open an issue for this? | 18:44:56 |
 emily | /run/user does not work for Darwin, but $TMPDIR is per-user on Darwin. unfortunately, the path is much too long | 19:04:50 |
| emily | (e.g. /var/folders/yd/mh726b5d2vqfyp132jtzq9t80000gn/T/) | 19:04:54 |
 jade_ | at work at the moment, can look after. I am highly surprised at there being a regression in sending emails | 19:23:26 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @jade_:matrix.org
at work at the moment, can look after. I am highly surprised at there being a regression in sending emails this is fixed | 20:23:39 |
| raitobezarius | MIXED cannot be used because we use different set of emails | 20:23:47 |
| raitobezarius | the fix is on infra | 20:23:50 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
/run/user does not work for Darwin, but $TMPDIR is per-user on Darwin. unfortunately, the path is much too long "the path is much too long" (sic) | 20:24:08 |
| raitobezarius | okie | 20:24:25 |
| jade_ | wait whut | 20:58:22 |
| jade_ | MIXED should mean that it puts "Sender Name (Code Review) <instance@instance.instance" | 20:58:47 |
| jade_ | * MIXED should mean that it puts "Sender Name (Code Review) <instance@instance.instance>" | 20:58:48 |
| raitobezarius | instance := gerrit instead of noreply | 20:58:55 |
| jade_ | omg | 20:58:59 |
| jade_ | okay you can fix that customwise tho | 20:59:04 |
| raitobezarius | look the infra right now | 20:59:10 |
| raitobezarius | it contains the fix | 20:59:12 |
| raitobezarius | (courtesy of emily) | 20:59:30 |
| jade_ | !! oh! thank you so much emily | 21:00:10 |
| 16 Jul 2025 |
 aloisw | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
Can you open an issue for this? Done: https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix/issues/919 | 04:54:25 |
 K900 | @jade_ +2ed | 07:32:53 |
| K900 | Send it | 07:32:58 |
| K900 | And I guess we need a new lixos-module tag? | 07:33:12 |
| jade_ | more +2s necessary. i think there are no known reasons to be running 2.92 over 2.93. i think there might be reasons to run 2.91 over 2.93 (cache query perf, which is fixed in 2.94), but whatever. those are edge case users. | 07:41:18 |
| jade_ | also CI seems jacked? | 07:41:26 |
| jade_ | or hasn't replied at least | 07:41:30 |
| jade_ | which is sus | 07:41:32 |
| jade_ | here is one offending CL for context: https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/3669 | 07:43:00 |
| jade_ | (i suspect it is non main branches maybe?) | 07:43:09 |
| K900 | Give me a minute | 07:45:11 |
