| 3 Sep 2025 |
 piegames | Before I go file an issue, can someone please try to build latest main within a /run/current-system/sw/bin/nix-shell --pure environment? | 07:09:12 |
|  ghpzin joined the room. | 07:36:22 |
 aloisw | Can't reproduce. Are you running from a fresh build directory? | 16:07:29 |
 jade_ | yeah iirc i fixed this by deleting a build directory | 17:54:19 |
| 4 Sep 2025 |
 helle (just a stray cat girl) | yes, that is a reused build directory problem | 04:30:37 |
| piegames | Okay, thanks | 04:54:20 |
|  n30w joined the room. | 13:42:15 |
| 5 Sep 2025 |
|  @thedragon44:matrix.org joined the room. | 09:49:26 |
| @thedragon44:matrix.org left the room. | 09:49:40 |
|  @ayatsfer:matrix.org left the room. | 11:24:13 |
|  z13 changed their display name from toot to z13. | 15:15:47 |
| aloisw | What is going on with the CI currently? I do not see the PR posting to new CLs any more. | 16:06:25 |
| jade_ | I am guessing besadii downtime | 19:29:22 |
| jade_ | but I am not sure, didn't manage to verify | 19:29:34 |
| 6 Sep 2025 |
 delroth | jade_: deployed the meilisearch change to git.lix.systems, please test and report on the infra PR | 04:22:59 |
| delroth | my quick testing seems to show that search works at least as good as before but I don't know what the bad cases you were hitting are :) | 04:23:25 |
| delroth | * my quick testing seems to show that search works at least as well as before but I don't know what the bad cases you were hitting are :) | 04:23:32 |
| aloisw | Should we backport the code owners to the release branches? | 09:02:55 |
|  SomeoneSerge (back on matrix) changed their display name from SomeoneSerge (Ever OOMed by Element) to SomeoneSerge (@nixcon & back on matrix). | 09:24:26 |
| aloisw | If I read https://buildkite.com/lix-project/lix correctly, the last build was on August 29th. So there indeed seems to be an outage. | 09:57:19 |
| aloisw | emily The nixpkgs bump backports are finished now and your changes rebased. I have verified that the heads build on my machine (x86_64-linux). However I'm not sure I haven't missed anything, we will know after the CI outage has been resolved I guess. | 12:18:38 |
 emily | oh, I am sorry to have induced you to spend effort on that, because I think on the Nixpkgs end we just established that we don't need to worry about keeping 2.91 and so on… | 12:55:14 |
| emily | which is a relief | 12:55:19 |
| emily | I was going to say the team should figure out whether 2.92 is staying too before we spend more effort on the backports. cc raitobezarius? | 12:55:36 |
| emily | (obviously 2.91 should get security support until the end of the year anyway since it's still default on 25.05, but it looks like we can drop whatever from unstable safely) | 12:56:01 |
 raitobezarius | DNS resolution issues, this was fixed some hours ago | 12:56:08 |
| emily | (so no need to worry about the toml11 bump for versions being dropped) | 12:56:14 |
| raitobezarius | I'd rather to do without 2.92 but I cannot keep track about what wolfgangwalther has settled on | 12:56:21 |
| raitobezarius | I did promise them that I would take care of security backports for that release until 25.11 is out, if I remember well | 12:56:47 |
| raitobezarius | Alright | 12:57:12 |
