| 14 Jan 2026 |
 K900 | I have a pretty bad migraine and touching display-manager dot service is not helping | 15:21:36 |
| 18 Jan 2026 |
|  isabel changed their profile picture. | 20:44:00 |
| 19 Jan 2026 |
|  bl1nk changed their profile picture. | 10:39:45 |
 Robert Hensing (roberth) | Hey all, I would much appreciate your feedback on https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/196: Self-describing store
This RFC proposes that stores provide a nix-store.json file declaring their properties, enabling:
- Discovery of store settings (storeDir, encoding, etc.)
- Forward compatibility through explicit feature requirements
- A unified replacement for the ad hoc nix-cache-info format
| 11:45:02 |
 raitobezarius | https://zulip.lix.systems/#narrow/channel/9-Store/topic/.5BRFC.20from.20CppNix.5D.20Self.20describing.20store/with/5006 | 13:33:11 |
 Winter | looks like a exportReferencesGraph (that takes a while) may block the output of build logs from other drvs being built at the same time -- does this sound realistic to anyone before i mre? | 22:35:55 |
| Winter | might be a nix-specific issue though, let me see (haven't confirmed whether the bug is in both yet, it's annoying to repro) | 22:36:40 |
| raitobezarius | I don't think we did anything particular on this builtin | 22:37:10 |
| 20 Jan 2026 |
 Rutile (rootile) | https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/4676
still looking for review | 13:05:25 |
| 22 Jan 2026 |
|  Lotte (it/its)/Cinny (she/her) ΞΈΞ& changed their profile picture. | 16:47:44 |
| 23 Jan 2026 |
|  @io:meat.computer left the room. | 00:53:04 |
|  vczf changed their profile picture. | 18:47:03 |
 Ramses π΅πΈ | nix path-info shows this confusing label ultimate, and I had to go look in the source code to figure out that it basically means that the store path was built locally. Could we not indicate that by locally-built or something like that to make it a lot more obvious? | 19:56:03 |
| Ramses π΅πΈ | * `nix path-info --sigs` shows this confusing label `ultimate`, and I had to go look in the source code to figure out that it basically means that the store path was built locally. Could we not indicate that by `locally-built` or something like that to make it a lot more obvious? | 19:56:50 |
| Ramses π΅πΈ | I could make the CL, but I wanted to check first whether it's a change that would get accepted | 19:59:12 |
| 24 Jan 2026 |
|  holly [she/it] π³οΈββ§οΈ changed their profile picture. | 09:08:06 |
 m | Hello! Is GItHub the only way to login to the Forgejo instance? No email login or Codeberg account? | 12:54:37 |
| K900 | You can set up a Keycloak account with Github, then unlink it | 14:10:03 |
| K900 | Or we can set one up for you manually if you give me an email | 14:10:18 |
| m | Nah, it's alright, don't want to bother. Thank you tho π | 15:16:13 |
| 25 Jan 2026 |
|  dadada changed their profile picture. | 20:34:16 |
| dadada changed their profile picture. | 20:39:16 |
| dadada changed their profile picture. | 21:17:53 |
| 16 May 2024 |
|  zrsk joined the room. | 13:54:49 |
 samrose | In reply to @lunaphied:lunaphied.me
I think there were a few CLs on the Gerrit but nothing being actively worked The other thing that I could do if it helps is test things and try to find bugs. I did do some C++ work in the past, but may lack the time to do it justice here at least for about 30 days or so | 15:55:29 |
 Qyriad | we are not in any rush π | 17:20:53 |
| samrose | Would it help to also test out the existing Lix code and try to find issues/bugs etc? | 17:23:21 |
| Qyriad | absolutely | 17:23:41 |
| samrose |
- how do people feel about the existing test suite that comes along with nix source code or Lix?
| 17:23:48 |
| Qyriad | it's pitiful | 17:24:10 |
