| 10 Dec 2025 |
 piegames | Though on a first glance the ariadne API seems a lot simpler | 15:32:55 |
 Charles | hmm what about chumsky precludes its use for LSPs and formatters? | 15:34:30 |
 kloenk | my want for a lossless syntax tree. Chumsky apparently can somehow integrate into rowan, but found it so painful that I decided to use logos and do it with only logos | 15:35:09 |
| Charles | oh right yeah i forgot to mention rowan exists | 15:35:29 |
| kloenk | yeah that is true. and apparently they have a todo for screen reader output so maybe at some point | 15:35:52 |
| piegames | For lix performance will be key and everything else will require a secondary parser. Maybe even error handling will get a secondary parser | 15:35:59 |
| piegames | In reply to @kloenk:kloenk.eu
my want for a lossless syntax tree. Chumsky apparently can somehow integrate into rowan, but found it so painful that I decided to use logos and do it with only logos With lossless syntax tree you mean CST? | 15:36:19 |
| kloenk | then cumsky could be interesting. but apparently it's a pain with the type signatures. My (kconfig) project sadly is single threaded either way as the language is shit | 15:36:46 |
| kloenk | yeah I think that's the same. never exatly sure what is what | 15:37:00 |
| piegames | One thing I worry about nom is that statless parsing is simpler but may end up requiring more allocations/moves of data and thus hurt performance. Winnow seems to support stateful parsing. How does chumpksy work there? | 15:39:10 |
| piegames | Stateful parsing is more annoying on backtracking, but the Nix language is almost LL1 and the two edge cases where it isn't can be handled manually | 15:39:52 |
 K900 | cumsky | 15:40:12 |
| K900 | Sorry | 15:40:14 |
| piegames | Chompsky | 15:41:12 |
