| 10 Nov 2025 |
 piegames | Yes but once you ban it you want to move off all functions off your data structures to retain the ability to compare your data | 08:18:42 |
 K900 | Yes | 08:18:57 |
| K900 | Unironically yes | 08:18:58 |
 Qyriad | In reply to @piegames:flausch.social
Yes but once you ban it you want to move off all functions off your data structures to retain the ability to compare your data well, unless you simply don't count functions in structure comparisons | 08:19:09 |
| piegames | Glad we agree. I still need a vision how to do that for a language within the Nix ecosystem tbh | 08:19:45 |
| K900 | There's literally one place in nixpkgs where this is relevant | 08:19:47 |
| K900 | And it can be fixed with a treewide | 08:19:57 |
| K900 | Annoying as that may be | 08:20:02 |
| piegames | That would be possible but honestly feel weird | 08:20:12 |
| piegames | Which one? | 08:20:17 |
| K900 | Platform equality | 08:20:28 |
| Qyriad | In reply to @piegames:flausch.social
That would be possible but honestly feel weird it would make comparison trinary, ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ | 08:20:52 |
| piegames | How so? | 08:21:29 |
| K900 | Expr::eq(this, that) -> MsoTristate | 08:21:36 |
| K900 | When | 08:21:36 |
