| 14 Oct 2025 |
 K900 | That's almost a good abstraction | 16:34:03 |
 WeetHet | Isn't nixpkgs minimum nix version still 2.18? | 16:36:56 |
 emily | but if the implementation is going to consume those structured formats, then there's an argument for a built-in to convert them :) | 16:37:15 |
| emily | the feature detection is precisely what caused the hash divergence. | 16:37:31 |
| WeetHet | Well yes, but how did the original PR even get accepted if it would cause different results on 2.18 and whatever the current version of nix is | 16:39:09 |
| emily | how would that be tested? | 16:39:58 |
| emily | Nix 2.18 is EOL | 16:40:06 |
| emily | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/451926 will check hashes of Lix vs. Nix, but has not been implemented yet, that is how this was found | 16:40:26 |
 Qyriad | not if we accept hash = { algo, format, digest }; in FODs too, right? | 17:43:09 |
