| 10 Sep 2025 |
 emily | I thought the agreed on plan was dropping 2.91 and 2.92? | 18:39:41 |
| emily | from 25.11 | 18:39:43 |
 raitobezarius | Yes, I'm talking about the cherry-picks that alois requested me on cl.lix.systems | 18:39:54 |
| emily | ah, okay | 18:39:55 |
| raitobezarius | (I should be more explicit in context, it's my bad) | 18:40:09 |
 aloisw | (that is, bumping nixpkgs to a recent enough 25.05 to not fail to evaluate the test on host nix with toml11 4) | 18:40:13 |
| aloisw | raitobezarius 2.91 is already finished, the macOS thing is prerequisite for the C++23 bump. | 18:42:08 |
| raitobezarius | aloisw you should be unblocked | 18:44:04 |
| raitobezarius | thanks for taking care of this | 18:44:10 |
| aloisw | Thank you for the reviews, I have merged on all supported branches (2.91, 2.92, 2.93, main) now so CI should be unblocked. | 18:45:06 |
| aloisw | toml11 support changes on 2.93 will need rebase and code owner override approval. | 18:46:42 |
| emily | FWIW, it will only be broken by the next staging-next, so it is also an option to just let them break on staging for now and remove them before that lands | 18:46:48 |
| raitobezarius | I'm looking at killing 2.92 | 18:47:36 |
|  tsandrini (any/all) changed their display name from tsandrini to tsandrini (any/all). | 18:54:26 |
| raitobezarius | emily i think i did the job, please don't hesitate to mention me if I missed something | 19:10:47 |
| emily | will take a look later, thank you! | 19:51:41 |
 WeetHet | Can we make this happen? https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/2580 | 20:07:56 |
