| 15 Jul 2025 |
 jade_ | omg | 20:58:59 |
| jade_ | okay you can fix that customwise tho | 20:59:04 |
 raitobezarius | look the infra right now | 20:59:10 |
| raitobezarius | it contains the fix | 20:59:12 |
| raitobezarius | (courtesy of emily) | 20:59:30 |
| jade_ | !! oh! thank you so much emily | 21:00:10 |
| 16 Jul 2025 |
 aloisw | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
Can you open an issue for this? Done: https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix/issues/919 | 04:54:25 |
 K900 | @jade_ +2ed | 07:32:53 |
| K900 | Send it | 07:32:58 |
| K900 | And I guess we need a new lixos-module tag? | 07:33:12 |
| jade_ | more +2s necessary. i think there are no known reasons to be running 2.92 over 2.93. i think there might be reasons to run 2.91 over 2.93 (cache query perf, which is fixed in 2.94), but whatever. those are edge case users. | 07:41:18 |
| jade_ | also CI seems jacked? | 07:41:26 |
| jade_ | or hasn't replied at least | 07:41:30 |
| jade_ | which is sus | 07:41:32 |
| jade_ | here is one offending CL for context: https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/3669 | 07:43:00 |
| jade_ | (i suspect it is non main branches maybe?) | 07:43:09 |
| K900 | Give me a minute | 07:45:11 |
| K900 | Getting food | 07:45:12 |
| K900 | OK done | 07:46:05 |
| jade_ | oh wait, wasn't secondary branch ci a known bug? i think it rings a bell... | 07:48:10 |
| jade_ | anyway bedtime for me | 07:48:36 |
| K900 | Uhh is the installer manifest out of date | 12:10:29 |
| K900 | A friend just got 2.93.0 | 12:10:34 |
| raitobezarius | https://releases.lix.systems/manifest.nix | 12:11:07 |
| raitobezarius | i see 2.93.2 | 12:11:10 |
| raitobezarius | ah the installer manifest must be out of date yes… | 12:11:16 |
| raitobezarius | jade_ if you have some time to push new installers, that'd be great | 12:11:41 |
|  pythoner6 joined the room. | 20:10:41 |
|  Nigel joined the room. | 20:29:10 |
|  Elian joined the room. | 22:22:42 |
