!lymvtcwDJ7ZA9Npq:lix.systems

Lix Development

405 Members
(Technical) development of Lix, the package manager, a Nix implementation. Please be mindful of ongoing technical conversations in this channel.136 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
11 Nov 2025
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (DECT: 7248)aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah18:52:30
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinterfor god knows what reason18:52:32
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinterlol18:52:32
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinterok thanks18:52:35
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (DECT: 7248):D18:52:39
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinteri'll submit some PRs then ^^18:52:41
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (DECT: 7248)thanks!18:52:45
@shine:proqqul.netTaeer Bar-Yamyeah, checking real-world cases is essential, but there is also something more pernicious about relying on false-y values than true-y values. if we throw out any notion of function equality, we break code that more reasonably relies on true-y values too.19:05:07
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (DECT: 7248)Yeah, this is a tradeoff decision19:28:32
@commentator2.0:elia.gardenRutile (Commentator2.0) feel free to pingLi: am kinda curious: when will lix officially break bug compatibility and finally fix them?19:29:24
@delroth:delroth.netdelrothFYI: git.lix.systems might have some short unavailability in the next hour or so while I push a security update19:32:41
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (DECT: 7248)
In reply to @commentator2.0:elia.garden
Li: am kinda curious: when will lix officially break bug compatibility and finally fix them?
I don't know
19:45:42
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (DECT: 7248)All of this is very langver shaped and we don't have langver 19:45:54
@delroth:delroth.netdelroth(done)19:46:49
16 May 2024
@aciceri:nixos.devzrsk joined the room.13:54:49
@samrose:matrix.orgsamrose
In reply to @lunaphied:lunaphied.me
I think there were a few CLs on the Gerrit but nothing being actively worked
The other thing that I could do if it helps is test things and try to find bugs. I did do some C++ work in the past, but may lack the time to do it justice here at least for about 30 days or so
15:55:29
@qyriad:katesiria.orgQyriadwe are not in any rush 🙂17:20:53
@samrose:matrix.orgsamroseWould it help to also test out the existing Lix code and try to find issues/bugs etc?17:23:21
@qyriad:katesiria.orgQyriadabsolutely17:23:41
@samrose:matrix.orgsamrose
  • how do people feel about the existing test suite that comes along with nix source code or Lix?
17:23:48
@qyriad:katesiria.orgQyriadit's pitiful17:24:10
@samrose:matrix.orgsamroseheh 17:24:16
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (DECT: 7248)expanding it is cool17:24:23
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (DECT: 7248)writing new tests for builtins which are not tested17:24:30
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius (DECT: 7248)new test behaviors, etc.17:24:32
@qyriad:katesiria.orgQyriad we have three flavors of test:
  1. gtest (offer only available in libexpr and libutil)

  2. bash script

  3. virtual machine


the vast, vast majority of testing is in the "bash script" flavor and it is a mess
17:25:01
@samrose:matrix.orgsamroseI was just going to ask on the "functional" tests: do we still like using bash there?17:25:56
@samrose:matrix.orgsamrosethe last time that I worked on a major nix related cli project that used bash, or bats for testing, over time it became rather kind of hard to maintain17:26:42
@samrose:matrix.orgsamroseI am not usually a big python fan, but in that project we heard from some in the Rust community that they actually use Python to test CLI and seem to have success there. 17:27:59
@qyriad:katesiria.orgQyriadno gods please kill bash testing. the problem is that it's kind of really difficult to migrate an entire test suite and be sure that you actually migrated the test suite correctly and won't lose coverage accidentally in the process, which makes any kind of migration a bit nerve wracking17:28:36

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 10