| 11 Sep 2025 |
helle (just a stray cat girl) | that is at least a start for this particular one yeah, any info on this documented? | 12:53:07 |
jade_ | lix/libstore/trace-probes.d, but there's just the one, it was written up to demo the infra primarily | 17:14:12 |
| 12 Sep 2025 |
| nightuser joined the room. | 13:30:35 |
Marie | would it be appropriate to backport this to 2.93?
https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/4156 | 16:33:17 |
raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | I don't see a big problem personally | 16:36:11 |
Marie | the meson version bump might be not so nice | 17:31:06 |
Marie | found a way to work around that | 17:58:57 |
Marie | ughh i just noticed my check is wrong, it should be the other way around | 19:39:54 |
emily | raitobezarius: jade_: is there still a need for capnproto-lix on 25.11? looks like all of the debug/coroutine changes are in Nixpkgs, and Nixpkgs is on a newer version with the patches upstreamed | 21:05:58 |
emily | the old version is broken by CMake 4, so I would at least like to make it conditional on pkgs.capnproto.version | 21:06:15 |
emily | oh wait, it was removed from main | 21:07:07 |
emily | I was just trying to build 2.93. ok never mind then | 21:07:15 |
Marie | is the asanBuild check flaky? it fails on buildkite for https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/4160 but it works locally for me | 21:51:11 |
raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | ASAN exposes more flakiness of our test suite | 22:19:07 |
Qyriad | btw is it normal to have thousands of logs of
Yuki pasta[1161683]: lseek() failed on /proc/net file
Yuki pasta[1161683]: : Illegal seek
| 22:41:18 |
Qyriad | (in journald from nix-daemon.service) | 22:42:07 |
@lt1379:matrix.org | Is that https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250815195616.64497967@chagall.paradoxon.rec/ ? | 22:44:41 |
Qyriad | we are on 6.12.42 | 22:46:20 |
Qyriad | so maybe | 22:46:22 |
raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | In reply to @qyriad:katesiria.org so maybe This is it | 23:31:20 |
raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) | Fixed in latest stables | 23:31:34 |
| 13 Sep 2025 |
emily | how much of a pain would it be to get a 2.32 release cut with the toml11 fixes? | 03:49:24 |
emily | er. 2.93 | 03:49:31 |
aloisw | It was not removed, just moved to the overlay to fix the splicing. | 05:18:55 |
emily | so it was. I wonder why the build isn't broken with it then. | 05:19:39 |
emily | it seems like it's no longer necessary on 25.11 at least. | 05:19:57 |
aloisw | How are you building? | 05:19:57 |
emily | with LLVM 21. | 05:20:04 |
emily | and a bunch of other things | 05:20:07 |
emily | er, CMake 4 in particular | 05:20:28 |