| 7 Sep 2025 |
Simon Hauser | Redacted or Malformed Event | 12:30:40 |
emily | should we decide what releases are supported first? 😅 | 14:05:35 |
emily | my understanding is that it was going to be just 2.93 and 2.91-on-25.05? | 14:06:00 |
emily | my stack forward-ports the new toml11, or do you mean it happens before that point in the stack? | 14:07:11 |
aloisw | It happens before that point because the host nix evaluates something for the nixpkgs lib tests. | 14:07:43 |
emily | yeah then it's just what @xokdvium:matrix.org says | 14:08:06 |
aloisw | So all evals in CI will fail unless bumped past that nixpkgs PR. | 14:08:11 |
emily | because lib tests were very silly | 14:08:15 |
emily | the Nixpkgs PR adding that absurd test should never have been merged either :( | 14:09:04 |
aloisw | Wait it was fully intentional to test the buggy integer saturation? | 14:10:14 |
emily | yes and there was a blocking review from lib maintainer saying "uh. no?" | 14:11:36 |
emily | and then it got cherry-picked into a GSoC PR without modification | 14:11:51 |
emily | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/433710#issuecomment-3189728351 | 14:12:47 |
emily | feeding hashString into fromHexString was not only a test, it was one of two examples in the docs!! | 14:13:28 |
emily | 🫠| 14:13:42 |
emily | it never worked on 2.3 either | 14:19:21 |
emily | so nobody ever tried to eval lib tests with 2.3 on 24.11 or 25.05, at least as the host Nix | 14:19:49 |
aloisw | In reply to @aloisw:julia0815.de Let's see whether https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/4142 succeeds in CI, I will post backports to all supported releases if it does. It succeeds now and should unblock CI on main again. | 19:40:22 |
emily | this will update over the nixfmt bump I think? | 21:09:25 |
emily | so the Nix files should probably get reformatted | 21:09:37 |
emily | oh | 21:10:02 |
emily | you did whoops | 21:10:04 |
emily | I remembered the diff being bigger when I inadvertently did it | 21:10:23 |
| 8 Sep 2025 |
| Federico Damián Schonborn changed their display name from Mr. Bones (he/they) to Federico Damián Schonborn (he/they). | 00:29:27 |
aloisw | In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org you did whoops If I didn't CI would fail due to the "pre-commit" check. (Yes I learned that the hard way.) | 05:08:48 |
raitobezarius | (I'm sorry, I'm unable to catch up with this room, so I don't know if there's anything that people are blocked on a core team member or just an active committer, please mention me if so.) | 14:39:25 |
aloisw | For main the change needs to be stamped by someone with +2 access. Release branches will need code owner override in addition (I will need to fix the CI failures first though, 2.93 and 2.92 are probably flakes but 2.91 needs more effort). | 15:28:31 |
aloisw | Ok 2.93 was a flake, it is verified now. | 15:29:11 |
aloisw | The CI unblock stacks are now finished (modulo nix-copy flakes) and review requested from people I believe to have sufficient permission on all branches. | 19:08:22 |
emily | does anyone have any idea why functional-shell is so flaky | 19:21:17 |