| 7 Sep 2025 |
 @aloisw:julia0815.de | I'm preparing a nixpkgs bump fwiw that should fix this. | 12:01:14 |
 raitobezarius | In reply to @aloisw:julia0815.de
Is the one on the aarch64-linux builders updated to toml11 4? I don't know OTOH | 12:02:08 |
| @aloisw:julia0815.de | Let's see whether https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/4142 succeeds in CI, I will post backports to all supported releases if it does. | 12:04:07 |
 Simon Hauser | Redacted or Malformed Event | 12:30:40 |
 emily | should we decide what releases are supported first? 😅 | 14:05:35 |
| emily | my understanding is that it was going to be just 2.93 and 2.91-on-25.05? | 14:06:00 |
| emily | my stack forward-ports the new toml11, or do you mean it happens before that point in the stack? | 14:07:11 |
| @aloisw:julia0815.de | It happens before that point because the host nix evaluates something for the nixpkgs lib tests. | 14:07:43 |
| emily | yeah then it's just what @xokdvium:matrix.org says | 14:08:06 |
| @aloisw:julia0815.de | So all evals in CI will fail unless bumped past that nixpkgs PR. | 14:08:11 |
| emily | because lib tests were very silly | 14:08:15 |
| emily | the Nixpkgs PR adding that absurd test should never have been merged either :( | 14:09:04 |
