| 7 Sep 2025 |
 emily | feeding hashString into fromHexString was not only a test, it was one of two examples in the docs!! | 14:13:28 |
| emily | š« | 14:13:42 |
| emily | it never worked on 2.3 either | 14:19:21 |
| emily | so nobody ever tried to eval lib tests with 2.3 on 24.11 or 25.05, at least as the host Nix | 14:19:49 |
 aloisw | In reply to @aloisw:julia0815.de
Let's see whether https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/4142 succeeds in CI, I will post backports to all supported releases if it does. It succeeds now and should unblock CI on main again. | 19:40:22 |
| emily | this will update over the nixfmt bump I think? | 21:09:25 |
| emily | so the Nix files should probably get reformatted | 21:09:37 |
| emily | oh | 21:10:02 |
| emily | you did whoops | 21:10:04 |
| emily | I remembered the diff being bigger when I inadvertently did it | 21:10:23 |
| 8 Sep 2025 |
|  Federico DamiƔn Schonborn changed their display name from Mr. Bones (he/they) to Federico DamiƔn Schonborn (he/they). | 00:29:27 |
| aloisw | In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
you did whoops If I didn't CI would fail due to the "pre-commit" check. (Yes I learned that the hard way.) | 05:08:48 |
 raitobezarius | (I'm sorry, I'm unable to catch up with this room, so I don't know if there's anything that people are blocked on a core team member or just an active committer, please mention me if so.) | 14:39:25 |
| aloisw | For main the change needs to be stamped by someone with +2 access. Release branches will need code owner override in addition (I will need to fix the CI failures first though, 2.93 and 2.92 are probably flakes but 2.91 needs more effort). | 15:28:31 |
| aloisw | Ok 2.93 was a flake, it is verified now. | 15:29:11 |
| aloisw | The CI unblock stacks are now finished (modulo nix-copy flakes) and review requested from people I believe to have sufficient permission on all branches. | 19:08:22 |
| emily | does anyone have any idea why functional-shell is so flaky | 19:21:17 |
| emily | I'm consistently failing to build it on my branch on Linux to the point where I'm starting to question whether I somehow broke it | 19:21:31 |
| 9 Sep 2025 |
| raitobezarius | I know why functional-repl is like this | 12:37:39 |
| raitobezarius | But I cannot remember why functional-shell | 12:37:44 |
| raitobezarius | In general, I feel like the source of flakiness is sleep as a sync-mutex primitive? | 12:37:58 |
| emily | it was indeed broken by a change I made. specifically when the change is present in both host and guest Nix | 14:58:55 |
|  zrsk changed their display name from zrsk to aciceri. | 15:01:01 |
| raitobezarius | lovely | 16:13:44 |
| emily | raitobezarius: any chance of updating the Lix version drop PR soon? | 18:46:52 |
| emily | Nix is ready for the toml11 bump and CMake 4 requires it | 18:47:08 |
| emily | hoping to land that in the next staging-next cycle so would be good to know what Lix backports are going to be necessary | 18:47:28 |
| aloisw | If we want to do releases with the fixes 2.91 will need a bit more work. The required nixpkgs bumps are performed but C++23 leads to a weird destructor error. | 18:50:42 |
| emily | the idea is to drop 2.91 | 20:41:08 |
| emily | and 2.92 | 20:41:11 |
