| 7 Sep 2025 |
 emily | should we decide what releases are supported first? 😅 | 14:05:35 |
| emily | my understanding is that it was going to be just 2.93 and 2.91-on-25.05? | 14:06:00 |
| emily | my stack forward-ports the new toml11, or do you mean it happens before that point in the stack? | 14:07:11 |
 aloisw | It happens before that point because the host nix evaluates something for the nixpkgs lib tests. | 14:07:43 |
| emily | yeah then it's just what @xokdvium:matrix.org says | 14:08:06 |
| aloisw | So all evals in CI will fail unless bumped past that nixpkgs PR. | 14:08:11 |
| emily | because lib tests were very silly | 14:08:15 |
| emily | the Nixpkgs PR adding that absurd test should never have been merged either :( | 14:09:04 |
| aloisw | Wait it was fully intentional to test the buggy integer saturation? | 14:10:14 |
| emily | yes and there was a blocking review from lib maintainer saying "uh. no?" | 14:11:36 |
| emily | and then it got cherry-picked into a GSoC PR without modification | 14:11:51 |
| emily | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/433710#issuecomment-3189728351 | 14:12:47 |
